Volume 19, Issue 4 (2019)                   Modares Mechanical Engineering 2019, 19(4): 911-918 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Arvahi M, Masoudi S, Mohammadi A. Interfacial Tension Measurement Using Microfluidics. Modares Mechanical Engineering. 2019; 19 (4) :911-918
URL: http://journals.modares.ac.ir/article-15-17921-en.html
1- Chemical & Petroleum Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
2- Chemical & Petroleum Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran , amohammadi@sharif.edu
Abstract:   (547 Views)
Microfluidic chips in the last two decades have had significant advances in the analysis of interfacial tension phenomenon due to their many advantages. To analyze interfacial tension phenomena, droplet flow in microchannels can be used. In this study, water-n-hexane interfacial tension in the presence of surface-active agents was measured, using microfluidic tensiometry. For this purpose, a glass microfluidic flow-focusing junction was fabricated for generating n-hexane droplets within an aqueous phase. The dependence of droplet size on the concentration of surfactants has been investigated. A theoretical equation was developed, considering force balance on the droplet generation in the microfluidic device, giving a relation between the interfacial tension and the generated droplet sizes.  By standardizing the microfluidic chips with the aid of a system, whose interfacial tension is known (hexane normal and tween 20 in distilled water), interfacial tension can be measured with measuring the size of produced droplets for other systems that can form droplets in the microchannel. In this study, the microfluidic device and the relation were employed to measure the interfacial tension in the presence of either of sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) or Cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) surfactants. It was found that the measured interfacial tensions deviate less than 10% compared to those measured with a commercially available ring method.
Full-Text [PDF 517 kb]   (266 Downloads)    

Received: 2018/03/14 | Accepted: 2018/11/7 | Published: 2019/04/6

1. Nguyen NT, Wereley ST. Fundamentals and applications of microfluidics. 2nd Edition. Norwood: Artech House; 2002. [Link]
2. Haeberle S, Zengerle R. Microfluidic platforms for lab-on-a-chip applications. Lab on a Chip. 2007;7(9):1094-1110. [Link] [DOI:10.1039/b706364b]
3. Christopher GF, Anna SL. Microfluidic methods for generating continuous droplet streams. Journal of Physics D Applied Physics. 2007;40(19):R319-R336. [Link] [DOI:10.1088/0022-3727/40/19/R01]
4. Priest C, Reid MD, Whitby CP. Formation and stability of nanoparticle-stabilised oil-in-water emulsions in a microfluidic chip. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2011;363(1):301-306. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2011.07.060]
5. Razzaq T, Glasnov TN, Oliver Kappe C. Continuous-flow microreactor chemistry under high-temperature/pressure conditions. European Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2009;2009(9):1321-1325. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/ejoc.200900077]
6. Kim YH, Zhang L, Yu T, Jin M, Qin D, Xia Y. Droplet-based microreactors for continuous production of palladium nanocrystals with controlled sizes and shapes. Small. 2013;9(20):3462-3467. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/smll.201203132]
7. Hu J, Zhou Sh, Sun Y, Fang X, Wu L. Fabrication, properties and applications of Janus particles. Chemical Society Reviews. 2012;41(11):4356-4378. [Link] [DOI:10.1039/c2cs35032g]
8. Wang K, Lu YC, Xu JH, Luo GS. Determination of dynamic interfacial tension and its effect on droplet formation in the T-shaped microdispersion process. Langmuir. 2009;25(4):2153-2158. [Link] [DOI:10.1021/la803049s]
9. Umbanhowar PB, Prasad V, Weitz DA. Monodisperse emulsion generation via drop break off in a coflowing stream. Langmuir. 2000;16(2):347-351. [Link] [DOI:10.1021/la990101e]
10. Steegmans MLJ, Warmerdam A, Schroën KGPH, Boom RM. Dynamic interfacial tension measurements with microfluidic Y-junctions. Langmuir. 2009;25(17):9751-9758. [Link] [DOI:10.1021/la901103r]
11. Zou H, Wu Sh, Shen J. Polymer/silica nanocomposites: Preparation, characterization, properties, and applications. Chemical Reviews. 2008;108(9):3893-3957. [Link] [DOI:10.1021/cr068035q]
12. Berry JD, Neeson MJ, Dagastine RR, Chan DYC, Tabor RF. Measurement of surface and interfacial tension using pendant drop tensiometry. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2015;454:226-237. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2015.05.012]
13. Hudson SD, Cabral JT, Goodrum Jr WJ, Beers KL, Amis EJ. Microfluidic interfacial tensiometry. Applied Physics Letters. 2005;87(8):081905. [Link] [DOI:10.1063/1.2034098]
14. Xu JH, Li SW, Lan WJ, Luo GS. Microfluidic approach for rapid interfacial tension measurement. Langmuir. 2008;24(19):11287-11292. [Link] [DOI:10.1021/la801526n]
15. Zhang DF, Stone HA. Drop formation in viscous flows at a vertical capillary tube. Physics of Fluids. 1997;9(8):2234-2242. [Link] [DOI:10.1063/1.869346]
16. Lin CH, Lee GB, Lin YH, Chang GL. A fast prototyping process for fabrication of microfluidic systems on soda-lime glass. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering. 2001;11(6):726-732. [Link] [DOI:10.1088/0960-1317/11/6/316]
17. Starkweather BA, Zhang X, Counce RM. An experimental study of the change in the contact angle of an oil on a solid surface. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2000;39(2):362-366. [Link] [DOI:10.1021/ie980693g]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author