Volume 20, Issue 1 (January 2020)                   Modares Mechanical Engineering 2020, 20(1): 13-24 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Enferadi M, Ghasemi M, Shabakhty N. Vibration Control of Steel Jacket Platform through Shape Memory Alloys Damper. Modares Mechanical Engineering 2020; 20 (1) :13-24
URL: http://mme.modares.ac.ir/article-15-19630-en.html
1- Civil Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran
2- Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran , mrghasemi@eng.usb.ac.ir
3- Environmental & Water Resources Engineering Department, Civil Engineering School, Iran University of Science & Technology, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (4519 Views)
Service life and safety of a steel jacket platform is influenced by vibrations generated by environmental loads, waves and winds. Vibrations of the structure and deck may cause fatigue in the structural elements and joints. Also may disrupt the operation of the drilling equipment and facilities as well as the operation of the platform. Therefore, the main aim of this research is to control the vibrations of the steel jacket platform through shape memory alloys dampers. Shape memory alloys have two important properties of shape memory as well as superelastic behavior and are quite suitable for damping applications. In these alloys, crystal structures transition from the austenite to the martensite phase, and vice versa are accompanied by the energy dissipation. In this research, a 90m steel jacket structure equipped with SMA dampers installed in 80m water depth has been modeled as a multi-degree-of-freedom system and analyzed under the time history of wave loads. For solving the differential equations of system vibration and modeling the hysteresis behavior of the shape memory alloys elements, the direct integration alpha method and multi-linear idealized constitutive model have been used, respectively. Jacket platform equipped with the shape memory alloys dampers shows the better result with 42% reduction in deck displacement, 62% reduction in deck acceleration and 32% reduction in shear force of platform base.
Full-Text [PDF 1953 kb]   (2545 Downloads)    
Article Type: Letter to Editor | Subject: Marine Structures
Received: 2018/04/30 | Accepted: 2019/04/22 | Published: 2020/01/20

References
1. Li HN, Liu MM, Fu X. An innovative re-centering SMA-lead damper and its application to steel frame structures. Smart Materials and Structures. 2018;27(7):075029. [Link] [DOI:10.1088/1361-665X/aac28f]
2. Wang Sh, Meng X, Ji Sh, Fang H, Liu Y, Duan L. All-metal brace with hysteresis dissipation for impact protection of jacket platforms. Marine Structures. 2019;66:1-15. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.marstruc.2019.02.009]
3. Vandiver JK, Mitome Sh. Effect of liquid storage tanks on the dynamic response of offshore platforms. Applied Ocean Research. 1979;1(2):67-74. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0141-1187(79)90019-1]
4. Shafieefar M, Aghakouchak AA, Moharrami MR. Mass damper and buoyancy functioning of a submerged tank on the response of fixed offshore platforms. Modares Civil Engineering Journal. 2014;14(20):65-79. [Persian] [Link]
5. Patil KC, Jangid RS. Passive control of offshore jacket platforms. Ocean Engineering. 2005;32(16):1933-1949. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2005.01.002]
6. Jafarabad A, Kashani M, Adl Parvar MR, Golafshani AA. Hybrid damping systems in offshore jacket platforms with float-over deck. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2014;98:178-187. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.02.004]
7. Shabakhty N. System failure probability of offshore jack-up platforms in the combination of fatigue and fracture. Engineering Failure Analysis. 2011;18(1):223-243. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2010.09.002]
8. Zhang J, Ma Z, Liu F, Zhang Ch, Sharafi P, Rashidi M. Seismic performance and ice-induced vibration control of offshore platform structures based on the ISO-PFD-SMA brace system. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2017;2017:3596094. [Link] [DOI:10.1155/2017/3596094]
9. Tabeshpour MR, Komachi Y. Assessment and rehabilitation of jacket platforms. In: Moustafa A, editor. Earthquake resistant structures-design, assessment and rehabilitation. Rijeka: InTech. 2012. pp. 381-407. [Link]
10. Zhang BL, Han QL, Zhang XM, Tang GY. Active control of offshore steel jacket platforms. Singapore: Springer; 2019. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-981-13-2986-9]
11. Wood WL, Bossak M, Zienkiewicz OC. An alpha modification of Newmark's method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 1980;15(10):1562-1566. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/nme.1620151011]
12. Jani JM, Leary M, Subic A, Gibson MA. A review of shape memory alloy research, applications and opportunities. Materials & Design (1980-2015). 2014;56:1078-1113. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.084]
13. Guo Y, Klink A, Fu Ch, Snyder J. Machinability and surface integrity of Nitinol shape memory alloy. CIRP Annals. 2013;62(1):83-86. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cirp.2013.03.004]
14. Zhang Y, Zhu S. A shape memory alloy-based reusable hysteretic damper for seismic hazard mitigation. Smart Materials and Structures. 2007;16(5):1603-1613. [Link] [DOI:10.1088/0964-1726/16/5/014]
15. Wilde K, Gardoni P, Fujino Y. Base isolation system with shape memory alloy device for elevated highway bridges. Engineering Structures. 2000;22(3):222-229. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0141-0296(98)00097-2]
16. Auricchio F, Taylor RL, Lubliner J. Shape-memory alloys: Macromodelling and numerical simulations of the superelastic behavior. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 1997;146(3-4):281-312. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01232-7]
17. Ghodke Sh, Jangid RS. Equivalent linear elastic-viscous model of shape memory alloy for isolated structures. Advances in Engineering Software. 2016;99:1-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.04.005]
18. Paul S, Datta TK, Kapuria S. Control of fixed offshore jacket platform using semi-active hydraulic damper. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. 2009;131(4):041106. [Link] [DOI:10.1115/1.3160534]
19. Asgarian B, Moradi S. Seismic response of steel braced frames with shape memory alloy braces. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2011;67(1):65-74. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.06.006]
20. Ranjbar P, Malayjerdi E. Determining of the capacity of the jacket platforms by non-linear pushover analysis. The 6th International Offshore Industries Conference, 2015 May 4-5, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran. Tehran: Iranian Association of Marine Engineering; 2015. [Link]
21. Baron Rayleigh JWS. The Theory of Sound. 2nd Edition. 2nd Volume. New York: Dover Publications; 1945. [Link]
22. Morison JR, Johnson JW, Schaaf SA. The force exerted by surface waves on piles. Journal of Petroleum Technology. 1950;2(05):149-154. [Link] [DOI:10.2118/950149-G]
23. Zhang SF, Chen Ch, Zhang QX, Zhang DM, Zhang F. Wave loads computation for offshore floating hose based on partially immersed cylinder model of improved Morison formula. The Open Petroleum Engineering Journal. 2015;8(1):130-137. [Link] [DOI:10.2174/1874834101508010130]
24. DesRoches R, McCormick J, Delemont M. Cyclic properties of superelastic shape memory alloy wires and bars. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2004;130(1):38-46. [Link] [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:1(38)]
25. Masuda A, Noori M. Optimization of hysteretic characteristics of damping devices based on pseudoelastic shape memory alloys. International Journal of Non Linear Mechanics. 2002;37(8):1375-1386. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0020-7462(02)00024-0]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.