Volume 19, Issue 7 (2019)                   Modares Mechanical Engineering 2019, 19(7): 1655-1662 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kohdaragh M, Lotfollahi Yaghin M, Etefagh M, Mojtahedi A. Experimental Study of Damage Detection in Beam Using Dynamic Excitation System and Wavelet Packet Transform and Energy Rate Index. Modares Mechanical Engineering. 2019; 19 (7) :1655-1662
URL: http://journals.modares.ac.ir/article-15-26135-en.html
1- Civil Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Malekan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Malekan, Iran , koohdarag@malekaniau.ac.ir
2- Civil Engineering Faculty, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
3- Mechanic Engineering Department, Mechanic Engineering Faculty, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract:   (654 Views)
Most of structural failures are because of break in consisting materials. Beginning of these breaks is with crack, whose extension is a serious threat to behavior of structure; so, the methods of distinguishing and showing cracks are the most important subjects, which are being investigated. In this article, by experimental, a new smart portable mechanical system to detect damage in beam structures by wavelet packet energy rate index is introduced. At first, acceleration-time history is taken from the points of the simple support beam, using the accelerometer sensors, and then these signals are decomposed into packet wavelet components and the energy rate index is calculated for each, which is named by Wavelet Packet Energy Rate Index (WPERI). The results indicate that these values are a sensitive and accurate index for the identification of the cracks.
Full-Text [PDF 883 kb]   (115 Downloads)    

Received: 2018/10/14 | Accepted: 2019/01/7 | Published: 2019/07/1

References
1. Lotfollahi-Yaghin MA, Koohdaragh M. Examining the function of wavelet packet transform (WPT) and continues wavelet transform (CWT) in recognizing the crack specification. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 2011;15(3):497-506. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s12205-011-0925-2]
2. Koohdaragh M, Lotfollahi-Yaghin MA, Ettefagh MM, Mojtehedi A, Beyghbabaye B. Damage detection in beam-like structure based on wavelet packet. Scientific Research and Essays. 2011;6(7):1537-1545. [Link]
3. Ge M, Lui EM. Structural damage identification using system dynamic properties. Computers & structures. 2005;83(27):2185-2196. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.05.002]
4. Jiang LJ, Tang J, Wang KW. An enhanced frequency-shift-based damage identification method using tunable piezoelectric transducer circuitry. Smart Materials and Structures. 2006;15(3):799. [Link] [DOI:10.1088/0964-1726/15/3/016]
5. Lu ZR, Liu JK, Huang M, Xu WH. Identification of local damages in coupled beam systems from measured dynamic responses. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2009;326(1-2):177-189. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jsv.2009.04.028]
6. Ding L, Hao H, Zhu X. Evaluation of dynamic vehicle axle loads on bridges with different surface conditions. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2009;323(3-5):826-848. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jsv.2009.01.051]
7. Wyss JC, Su D, Fujino Y. Prediction of vehicle-induced local responses and application to a skewed girder bridge. Engineering Structures. 2011;33(4):1088-1097. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.020]
8. Wu SQ, Law SS. Vehicle axle load identification on bridge deck with irregular road surface profile. Engineering Structures. 2011;33(2):591-601. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.017]
9. Neves SGM, Azevedo AFM, Calçada R. A direct method for analyzing the vertical vehicle-structure interaction. Engineering Structures. 2012;34:414-420. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.10.010]
10. Wu SQ, Law SS. Evaluating the response statistics of an uncertain bridge-vehicle system. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2012;27:576-589. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.07.019]
11. Mallat SG. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 1989;11(7):674-693. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/34.192463]
12. Coifman RR, Wickerhauser MV. Entropy-based algorithms for best basis selection. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 1992;38(2):713-718. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/18.119732]
13. Sun Z, Chang CC. Structural damage assessment based on wavelet packet transform. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2002;128(10):1354-1361. [Link] [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:10(1354)]
14. Daubechies I. Ten lectures on wavelets. Philadelphia: SIAM; 1992. [Link] [DOI:10.1137/1.9781611970104]
15. Asgarian B, Aghaeidoost V, Shokrgozar HR. Damage detection of jacket type offshore platforms using rate of signal energy using wavelet packet transform. Marine Structures. 2016;45:1-21. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.marstruc.2015.10.003]
16. Zhou J, Li Z, Chen J. Damage identification method based on continuous wavelet transform and mode shapes for composite laminates with cutouts. Composite Structures. 2018;191:12-23. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.028]
17. Liu K, Yan RJ, Soares CG. Damage identification in offshore jacket structures based on modal flexibility. Ocean Engineering. 2018;170:171-185. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.10.014]
18. Ovanesova AV, Suárez LE. Applications of wavelet transforms to damage detection in frame structures. Engineering Structures. 2004;26(1):39-49. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.08.009]
19. Yen GG, Lin KC. Wavelet packet feature extraction for vibration monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. 2000;47(3):650-667. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/41.847906]
20. Hua-Sing Ang A, Tang HW. Probability concepts in engineering planning and design: Basic principles. Hoboken: Wiley; 1975. [Link]
21. Han JG, Ren WX, Sun ZS. Wavelet packet based damage identification of beam structures. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 2005;42(26):6610-6627. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.04.031]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author