Volume 19, Issue 9 (September 2019)                   Modares Mechanical Engineering 2019, 19(9): 2285-2297 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


1- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
2- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran , mrtavak@cc.iut.ac.ir
3- Department of Aerospace Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (5343 Views)
In the present study, a parametric study has been carried out to investigate the influence of ice accretion on the aerodynamic performance of NACA0012 airfoil through numerical simulations using FENSAP-ICE. The results reveal that at zero angle of attack the ice profile created on the leading edge of the airfoil is symmetric. The most dominant feature in the flow-field of an iced airfoil is a recirculation zone that forms due to concavity regions created on both upper and lower surfaces of the airfoil. The numerical simulations show that the appearance of the recirculation zone alters significantly the aerodynamic coefficients. At the angle of attack 12°, lift coefficient decreases by %20.58 and the drag coefficient increases by %15.92 in comparison with the clean airfoil. The effects of temperature and air flow velocity on the ice accretion created on the NACA0012 were investigated for glaze ice and rime ice. The thickness of ice increases with decreasing temperature, and glaze ice with the sharp horn is created at the temperatures ranging from 0°C to -14°C. Making the transition from glaze ice to rime ice occurs at temperatures varied from -14°C to -16°C and at temperatures below -16°C rime ice is created. In order to eliminate the ice accretion, a thermal de-icing system is simulated. By applying a heat power of 30 watts, the melting of 21.41 gr horn ice starts and the created ice on the airfoil surface is completely melted. It should be noted that with the introduction of thermal de-icing system the runback water flow on the airfoil’s surface occurs.
 
Full-Text [PDF 1529 kb]   (2016 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Marine Structures
Received: 2018/10/16 | Accepted: 2019/02/12 | Published: 2019/09/1

References
1. Palacios J, Smith E, Rose J, Royer R. Ultrasonic de-icing of wind-tunnel impact icing. Journal of Aircraft. 2011;48(3):1020-1027. [Link] [DOI:10.2514/1.C031201]
2. Tarquini S, Antonini C, Amirfazli A, Marengo M, Palacios J. Investigation of ice shedding properties of superhydrophobic coatings on helicopter blades. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2014;100:50-58. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.coldregions.2013.12.009]
3. Sastry S. Water: Ins and outs of ice nucleation. Nature. 2005;438(7069):746-747. [Link] [DOI:10.1038/438746a]
4. Zhang X, Min J, Wu X. Model for aircraft icing with consideration of property-variable rime ice. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2016;97:185-190. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.01.065]
5. Messinger BL. Equilibrium temperature of an unheated icing surface as a function of air speed. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences. 1953;20(1):29-42. [Link] [DOI:10.2514/8.2520]
6. Shin J, Bond TH. Results of an icing test on a NACA 0012 airfoil in the NASA Lewis icing research tunnel. 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 6-9 Jan 1992, Reno, NV, US. Reston VA: AIAA; 1992. [Link] [DOI:10.2514/6.1992-647]
7. Shin J, Berkowitz B, Chen HH, Cebeci T. Prediction of ice shapes and their effect on airfoil drag. Journal of Aircraft. 1994;31(2):263-270. [Link] [DOI:10.2514/3.46483]
8. Zhu ZQ, Wang XL, Liu J, Liu Z. Comparison of predicting drag methods using computational fluid dynamics in 2d/3d viscous flow. Science in China Series E Technological Sciences. 2007;50(5):534-549. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11431-007-0048-7]
9. Ackley SF, Templeton MK. Computer modeling of atmospheric ice accretion. CRRL Report. Hanover: Cold Regions Research and Engineering Lab; 1979 May. Reprt No: 79-4. [Link]
10. Arnold K, Tetzlaff G, Raabe A. Modeling of ice accretion on a non-rotating cylinder. Meteorologische Zeitschrift. 1997;6(3);120-129. [Link] [DOI:10.1127/metz/6/1997/120]
11. Lynch FT, Khodadoust A. Effects of ice accretions on aircraft aerodynamics. Progress in Aerospace Sciences. 2001;37(8):669-767. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0376-0421(01)00018-5]
12. Ashenden R, Lindberg W, Marwitz JD. Two-dimensional NACA 23012 airfoil performance degradation by super cooled cloud, drizzle, and rain drop icing. 34th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 15-18 January 1996, Reno, NV, USA. Reston VA: AIAA; 1996. [Link] [DOI:10.2514/6.1996-870]
13. Mirzaei M, Ardekani MA, Doosttalab M. Numerical and experimental study of flow field characteristics of an iced airfoil. Aerospace Science and Technology. 2009;13(6):267-276. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ast.2009.05.002]
14. Nazemi MM, Mirzaei M, Pouryoussefi GH. Experimental and numerical study of runback ice accretion effects on aerodynamic performance of NACA23012 airfoil. Modares Mechanical Engineering. 2015;15(6):7-15. [Persian] [Link]
15. Kaffash HR, Ajam H, Teimourtash AR. Experimental study of the effect of obstacles (icing) on the leading edge of NACA0015 airfoil. 1st International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Aerospace, Tehran, Iran. Tehran: Baqer al-Ulum Research Organization; 2016. [Persian] [Link]
16. Manshadi MD, Esfeh MK. Experimental investigation of flowfield over an iced an aerfoil. The Aeronautical Journal. 2016;120(1227):735-756. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/aer.2016.29]
17. Hughes TJR, Brooks A. A theoretical framework for Petrov-Galerkin methods with discontinuous weighting functions: Application to the streamline-upwind procedure. In: Gallagher RH, editor. Finite elements in fluids. 4th Volume. Hoboken: Wiley; 1982. pp. 47-63. [Link]
18. Bourgault Y, Beaugendre H, Habashi WG. Development of a shallow-water icing model in FENSAP-ice. Journal of Aircraft. 2000;37(4):640-646. [Link] [DOI:10.2514/2.2646]
19. Macklin WC. The density and structure of ice formed by accretion. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 1962;88(375):30-50. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/qj.49708837504]
20. Jones KF. The density of natural ice accretions related to nondimensional icing parameters. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 1990;116(492):477-496. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/qj.49711649212]
21. Mortensen K, Sørensen JN, Thomsen K. CFD simulations of an airfoil with leading edge ice accretion [Internet]. Lyngby: Technical University of Denmark; 2008 [cited 2017 Oct 12]. Available from: http://bit.ly/2Xvh7wk [Link]
22. Abbott IH, Von Doenhoff AE. Theory of wing sections, including a summary of airfoil data. New York: Courier Corporation; 1959. [Link]
23. Olsen W, Shaw RJ, Newton J. Ice shapes and the resulting drag increase for a NACA 0012 airfoil. 22nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 9-12 January 1984, Reno, NV, USA. Reston VA: AIAA; 1984. [Link] [DOI:10.2514/6.1984-109]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.