Volume 19, Issue 5 (May 2019)                   Modares Mechanical Engineering 2019, 19(5): 1221-1227 | Back to browse issues page

‎ 20.1001.1.10275940.1398.19.5.16.8

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sanjari B, Iranmanesh M. Investigation on the Effect of Guaranteed Selling of Generated Electric Power and Other Effective Parameters on the Application of CHP System in Iranian Industries. Modares Mechanical Engineering 2019; 19 (5) :1221-1227
URL: http://mme.modares.ac.ir/article-15-24245-en.html
Investigation on the Effect of Guaranteed Selling of Generated Electric Power and Other Effective Parameters on the Application of CHP System in Iranian Industries
B. Sanjari1 , M. Iranmanesh * 2
1- Energy Conversion & Renewable Energies Department, Institute of Science & High Technology & Environmental Sciences, Kerman Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran
2- Energy Institute, Institute of Science & High Technology & Environmental Sciences, Kerman Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran , m.iranmanesh@kgut.ac.ir
Abstract:   (3680 Views)

Industrial sector is always recognized as one of the largest energy consumers in each country. Besides the high energy consumption of industrial sector, a significant amount of energy is lost due to inefficient use and old machines. Combined heat and power (CHP) systems have always been considered as an efficient system to reduce energy consumption and increase productivity in the industry. The aim of this paper is techno-economic analysis of application of CHP systems in a few samples of different types of almost high energy consumer industries, considering the different approaches, on which the electrical capacity of the system is designed. In this study, a combination of various parameters such as different types of prime movers (gas turbine or reciprocating engine), different types of fuel (natural gas and diesel fuel), and guaranteed selling of generated electric power (GSGEP) in different industries are considered. Finally, after determining the capacity of the simultaneous production system for the selected factories, some important economic indicators like net present value (NPV), simple payback periods (SPB), and levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) were considered by two coupled software, MATLAB and Excel. The results showed that in all scenarios, the use of reciprocating engine as the prime mover and natural gas as its fuel is the best choice to satisfy the techno-economical goals.
 

Keywords: CHP System, Fuel Type, Prime Mover, Techno-economic Analysis, Guaranteed Selling of Generated Electric Power
Full-Text [PDF 446 kb]   (2838 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Renewable Energy
Received: 2018/08/18 | Accepted: 2018/12/6 | Published: 2019/05/1
References
1. Gudarzi Farahani Y, Varmazyari B, Moshtaridoust Sh. Energy consumption in Iran: Past trends and future directions. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012;62:12-17. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.004]
2. Utlu Z, Hepbasli A. A review and assessment of the energy utilization efficiency in the Turkish industrial sector using energy and exergy analysis method. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2007;11(7):1438-1459. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2005.11.006]
3. Dargahi H, Biabany Khamene K. Energy intensity determinants in an energy-exporting developing economy: Case of Iran. Energy. 2019;168:1031-1044. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.015]
4. Farajzadeh Z, Nematollahi MA. Energy intensity and its components in Iran: Determinants and trends. Energy Economics. 2018;73:161-177. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.021]
5. Sanaei SM, Furubayashi T, Nakata T. Assessment of energy utilization in Iran's industrial sector using energy and exergy analysis method. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2012;36:472-481. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.11.002]
6. IEA. Cogeneration and renewables: Solutions for a low-carbon energy future [Internet]. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2011 [cited 2018 Aug 01]. Available from: http://yon.ir/bXURb [Link]
7. Gvozdenac D, GvozdenacUrošević B, Menke C, Urošević B, Bangviwat A. High efficiency cogeneration: CHP and non-CHP energy. Energy. 2017;135:269-278. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.143]
8. Ghadimi P, Kara S, Kornfeld B. The optimal selection of on-site CHP systems through integrated sizing and operational strategy. Applied Energy. 2014;126:38-46. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.03.085]
9. De Macedo Rodrigues ML, Arrieta FRP, Sodré JR. Small scale biomass CHP plant: An assessment for an animal feed industry. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2013;59(1-2):174-181. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.05.031]
10. Ashok S, Banerjee R. Optimal operation of industrial cogeneration for load management. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2003;18(2):931-937. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2003.811169]
11. Marshman DJ, Chmelyk T, Sidhu MS, Gopaluni RB, Dumont GA. Energy optimization in a pulp and paper mill cogeneration facility. Applied Energy. 2010;87(11):3514-3525. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.04.023]
12. Kosugi T, Tokimatsu K, Zhou W. An economic analysis of a clean-development mechanism project: A case introducing a natural gas-fired combined heat-and-power facility in a Chinese industrial area. Applied Energy. 2005;80(2):197-212. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2004.04.001]
13. Farghal SA, El-Dewieny RM, Riad AM. Economic justification of cogeneration systems for industrial steam users and utility systems. IEE Proceedings C Generation Transmission and Distribution. 1989;136(2):100-107. [Link] [DOI:10.1049/ip-c.1989.0015]
14. Giaccone L, Canova A. Economical comparison of CHP systems for industrial user with large steam demand. Applied Energy. 2009;86(6):904-914. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.10.025]
15. Oskounejad MM. Engineering economy: Economic evaluation of industrial projects. 46th Edition. Tehran: Amir Kabir University of Technology; 2015. [Persian] [Link]
16. Konstantakos V, Pilavachi PA, Polyzakis A, Theofylaktos C. A decision support model for combined heat and power economic evaluation. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2012;42:129-135. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.03.018]
17. Kurnik CW, Simons G, Barsun S. Combined heat and power evaluation protocol. The uniform methods project: Methods for determining energy efficiency savings for specific measures [Internet]. Golden: National Renewable Energy Lab; 2017 [cited 2018 Aug 01]. Available from: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1406987 [Link]
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.