Volume 20, Issue 4 (April 2020)
Modares Mechanical Engineering 2020, 20(4): 819-832 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Dindar D, Jabbaripour B. Investigating the Effects of Flow Rate and Spraying Methods of CO2 Fluid on Tool Wear and workpiece Surface Quality in Cryogenic Turning of 304-L Stainless Steel. Modares Mechanical Engineering 2020; 20 (4) :819-832
URL: http://mme.modares.ac.ir/article-15-32574-en.html
URL: http://mme.modares.ac.ir/article-15-32574-en.html
1- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran ,beh.jabbaripour@iauctb.ac.ir
2- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran ,
Abstract: (2709 Views)
Increasing workpiece surface quality and reducing tool wear are always the most important ones in machining purposes. There are basic challenges to achieve optimum conditions for workpiece surface and tool life in different machining operations of austenitic stainless steel 304L due to low thermal conductivity and creating high temperatures at the cutting zone. Applying conventional cooling methods such as flood techniques does not usually provide desirable control of machining temperature. Also, their use often creates environmental problems. Recently, the cryogenic cooling process has been considered by researchers to reduce these problems in various machining methods. In this research, turning of 304L stainless steel using cryogenic cooling of CO2 have been studied to investigate the effect of flow rate and fluid spraying method on workpiece surface roughness and tool wear. For this purpose, the tool-workpiece contact zone has been cooled in five different methods of CO2 fluid spraying according to the number and position of the spraying nozzles (Up1, Up2, Down, Up1-Down, Up2-Down) and three different flow rates (12, 18 and 24 l/min). The minimum main flank wear of the tool was achieved in the Up1 cooling method and 18 l/min flow rate and the minimum workpiece surface roughness was achieved in the Up1 cooling method and 12 l/min flow rate. Regarding economic considerations to reduce the consumption of spraying flow of CO2 fluid and achieving the minimum main flank wear of the tool, built-up edge and workpiece surface roughness, the optimum spraying method and flow rate were obtained as Up1 and 12 l/min, respectively.ش
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Machining
Received: 2019/05/3 | Accepted: 2019/08/9 | Published: 2020/04/17
Received: 2019/05/3 | Accepted: 2019/08/9 | Published: 2020/04/17
References
1. Kalpakjian S, Schmid SR. Manufacturing engineering and technology. 1st Volume. 4th Edition. Besharati Givi MK, translator. Tehran: Institute of Publications and Printing of Tehran University; 2002. pp. 708-779. [Persian] [Link]
2. Busch K, Hochmuth C, Pause B, Stoll A, Wertheim R. Investigation of cooling and lubrication strategies for machining high-temperature alloys. Procedia CIRP. 2016;41:835-840. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.procir.2015.10.005]
3. Yildiz Y, Nalbant M. A review of cryogenic cooling in machining processes. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 2008;48(9):947-964. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.01.008]
4. Blau P, Busch K, Dix M, Hochmuth C, Stoll A, Wertheim R. Flushing strategies for high performance, efficient and environmentally friendly cutting. Procedia CIRP. 2015;26:361-366. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.058]
5. Jerold BD, Kumar MP. Machining of AISI 316 stainless steel under carbon-di-oxide cooling. Materials and Manufacturing Processes. 2012;27(10):1059-1065. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/10426914.2011.654153]
6. Hong SH, Markus I, Jeong WC. New cooling approach and tool life improvement in cryogenic machining of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. International Journl of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 2001;41(15):2245-2260. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0890-6955(01)00041-4]
7. Ali Khan A, Ahmed MI. Improving tool life using cryogenic cooling. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2008;196(1-3):149-154. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.05.030]
8. Gupta MK, Singh G, Sood PK. Experimental investigation of machining AISI 1040 Medium carbon steel under cryogenic machining: A comparison with dry machining. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C. 2015;96:373-379. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s40032-015-0178-9]
9. Jerold BD, Kumar MP. Experimental comparison of carbon-dioxide and liquid nitrogen cryogenic coolants in turning of AISI 1045 steel. Cryogenics. 2012;52(10):569-574. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2012.07.009]
10. Klocke F, Settineri L, Lung D, Priarone PC, Arft M. High performance cutting of gamma titanium aluminides: Influence of lubricoolant strategy on tool wear and surface integrity. Wear. 2013;302(1-2):1136-1144. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.wear.2012.12.035]
11. Kalyan Kumar KVBS, Choudhury SK. Investigation of tool wear and cutting force in cryogenic machining using design of experiments. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2008;203(1-3):95-101. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.036]
12. MagadumS, Arun Kumar S, Yoganath VG, Srinivasa CK. Cryogenic machining of SS304 steel. 5th International & 26th All India Manufacturing Technology, Design and Research Conference (AIMTDR 2014) December 12th-14th, 2014, IIT. Guwahati, Assam, India. Guwahati: Indian Institute of Technology; 2014?. [Link]
13. Mayer P, Skorupski R, Smaga M, Eifler D, Aurich JC. Deformation induced surface hardening when turning metastable austenitic steel AISI 347 with different cryogenic cooling strategies. Procedia CIRP. 2014;14:101-106. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.097]
14. Zurecki Z, Ghosh R, Frey JH. Investigation of white layers formed in conventional and cryogenic hard turning of steels. ASME 2003 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, November 15-21, 2003, Washington, DC, USA. New York: ASME; 2008. [Link] [DOI:10.1115/IMECE2003-42313]
15. Tajdari M, Zare Chavoshi S, Shahbazi E. Design and requirements of cryogenic cooling process using liquid nitrogen in turning. The second National Conference on Manufacturing Engineering, Islamic Azad University of Najafabad Branch, Iran, October 28, 2009. Tehran: civilica; 2009. [Persian] [Link]
16. Sharma VS, Dogra M, Suri NM. Cooling techniques for improved productivity in turning. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 2009;49(6):435-453. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.12.010]
17. Kaynak Y, Karaca HE, Jawahir IS. Surface integrity characteristics of NiTi shape memory alloys resulting from dry and cryogenic machining. Procedia CIRP. 2014;13:393-398. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.procir.2014.04.067]
18. Gupta MK, Sood PK. Optimizing multi characteristics in machining of AISI 4340 steel using Taguchi's approach and utility concept. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C. 2016;97(1):63-69. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s40032-015-0201-1]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |