مهندسی مکانیک مدرس

مهندسی مکانیک مدرس

بررسی رفتار کرنش‌های پیش‌رونده لوله‌های سه‌راهی از جنس فولاد ضدزنگ 304L براساس مدل‌های سخت‌شوندگی شابوشی و ترکیبی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان
گروه مهندسی مکانیک، دانشکده مهندسی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران
چکیده
در این مقاله، تحلیل المان محدود با مدل‌های سختی غیرخطی ترکیبی (مدل سینماتیکی آرمسترانگ- فردریک همراه با قانون سخت‌شوندگی ایزوتروپیکی) و مدل شابوشی برای بررسی رفتار کرنش‌های پیش‌رونده در لوله‌های سه‌راهی از جنس فولاد ضدزنگ و تحت بارگذاری ممان‌های دینامیکی همراه با تاثیر فشار داخلی مورد مطالعه قرار گرفته است. نتایج نشان می‌دهند که مقدار حداکثر تغییر شکل‌های پیش‌رونده در محل اتصال لوله‌های سه‌راهی رخ می‌دهد. همچنین نرخ تغییر شکل‌های پیش‌رونده با افزایش سطح بارگذاری خمشی در فشار ثابت افزایش می‌یابد. ملاحظه می‌شود که هندسه و ابعاد لوله سه‌راهی بر میزان و نرخ کرنش‌های پیش‌رونده تاثیر بسزایی دارد. مقایسه نشان می‌دهد نتایج عددی حاصل از کرنش‌های پیش‌رونده در نمونه BSS۱ (نمونه اول لوله سه‌راهی از جنس فولاد ضدزنگ) با مدل سختی ترکیبی و شابوشی در مقایسه با نتایج حاصل از مدل سختی آرمسترانگ فردریک بهتر بوده و به داده‌های تجربی نزدیک‌تر است. پیش‌بینی رفتار کرنش‌های پیش‌رونده در BSS۲ براساس مدل ترکیبی در مقایسه با سایر مدل‌ها به نتایج تجربی نزدیک‌تر است. البته در نمونه BSS۳ این پیش‌بینی رفتار، توسط مدل شابوشی در مقایسه با سایر مدل‌ها بهتر و به نتایج تجربی نزدیک‌تر است. همانند نمونه‌های فولاد کربنی ساده که در مقاله اخیر مورد مطالعه قرار گرفته، هر دو مدل سختی شابوشی و ترکیبی در مقایسه با مدل سختی آرمسترانگ- فردریک پیش‌بینی مناسب و تا حدودی مشابه هم نسبت به نتایج تجربی در نمونه‌های فولاد ضدزنگ از خود نشان می‌دهند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Study of Ratcheting Behavior of 304L Stainless Steel Branch Pipes by Using Chaboche and Combined Hardening Models

نویسندگان English

S.J. Zakavi
H. Mohammadi Asl
D. Babaee
Mechanical Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
چکیده English

In this paper, finite element analysis with combined (nonlinear isotropic/AF kinematic hardening model) and chaboche hardening models are employed to investigate ratcheting behavior in stainless steel branch pipes under dynamic moments and internal pressure. Obtained results show that the maximum value of ratcheting strain takes place in the junction of branch pipes in the hoop stress direction. In this case, the rate of progressive strains increases with the increase of the bending moment levels in constant internal pressure. Furthermore, this study reveals that the geometry and dimensions of branch pipes have a significant impact on the rate of progressive strains. The bending moment levels to initiate strain accumulation phenomena will be increased with the increase of the dimensions of branch pipes. In the BSS1 sample, comparison between results obtained using progressive strains with combined and chaboche hardening models are much better than those of Armstrong-Fredrick hardening model and are near to the experimental data. Of course, in BSS2 sample, the behavior of ratcheting with combined hardening model is near the experimental results. For the BSS3 sample, the prediction of ratcheting with the chaboche hardening model is better than using the other strain hardening models and are near to the experimental data. Like the carbon steel samples studied in the recent paper, compared to the Armstrong-Frederick hardening model, the chaboche and combined hardening models exhibit an appropriate prediction and similar to experimental results in stainless steel samples.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Stainless Steel Branch
Ratcheting Behavior
Combined Hardening Model
Chaboche Hardening Model
Bending loading
Edmunds HG, Beer FJ. Notes on incremental collapse in pressure vessels. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science. 1961;3(3):187-199. [Link] [DOI:10.1243/JMES_JOUR_1961_003_026_02]
Beaney EM. Measurement of dynamic response and failure of pipework. Strain. 1991;27(3):89-94. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1475-1305.1991.tb00762.x]
Chen X, Jiao R, Kim KS. On the Ohno-Wang kinematic hardening rules for multiaxial ratcheting modeling of medium carbon steel. International Journal of Plasticity. 2005;21(1):161-184. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.05.005]
Hassan T, Taleb L, Krishna Sh. Influence of non-proportional loading on ratcheting responses and simulations by two recent cyclic plasticity models. International Journal of Plasticity. 2008;24(10):1863-1889. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijplas.2008.04.008]
Zehsaz M, Zakavi SJ, Mahbadi H, Eslami MR. Cyclic strain accumulation of plain stainless steel pressurized cylinders subjected to dynamic bending moment. Journal of Applied Science. 2008;8(18):3129-3138. [Link] [DOI:10.3923/jas.2008.3129.3138]
Zakavi SJ, Zehsaz M, Eslami MR. The ratchetting behavior of pressurized plain pipework subjected to cyclic bending moment with the combined hardening model. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 2010;240(4):726-737. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.12.012]
Zakavi SJ, Nourbakhsh M. Study on strain accumulation of carbon steel pressurized piping elbows under dynamic out-of-plane bendings. Modares Mechanical Engineering. 2015;14(15):218-224. [Persian] [Link]
Zakavi SJ, Nourbakhsh M. The effect of basic factors on strain accumulation of pressurized piping elbows under dynamic moments. Modares Mechanical Engineering. 2015;15(5):412-418. [Persian] [Link]
Zakavi SJ, Malekzadeh B, Shayestehnia E, Shiralivand B. Evaluation of several hardening models in the ratcheting behavior of piping branch with different diameter/thickness ratios. Modares Mechanical Engineering. 2018;18(2):201-208. [Persian] [Link]
Yahiaoui K, Moffat DG, Moreton DN. Cumulative damage assessment of pressurised piping branch junctions under in-plane run pipe simulated seismic bending. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. 1995;63(2):119-128. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0308-0161(94)00024-D]
Yahiaoui K, Moffat DG, Moreton DN. Single frequency seismic loading tests on pressurized branch pipe intersections machined from solid. The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design. 1993;28(3):197-207. [Link] [DOI:10.1243/03093247V283197]
Hassan T, Kyriakides S. Ratcheting of cyclically hardening and softening materials: I. Uniaxial behavior. International Journal of Plasticity. 1994;10(2):149-184. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0749-6419(94)90033-7]
Hassan T, Kyriakides S. Ratcheting of cyclically hardening and softening materials: II. Multiaxial behavior. International Journal of Plasticity. 1994;10(2):185-212. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0749-6419(94)90034-5]
Ohno N. Current state of the art in constitutive modeling for ratcheting. 14th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 14), August 17-22, 1997, Lyon, France. Lyon: IASMiRT; 1997. p. 201-212. [Link]
Bari Sh, Hassan T. Anatomy of coupled constitutive models for ratcheting simulation. International Journal of Plasticity. 2000;16(3-4):381-409. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0749-6419(99)00059-5]
Bari Sh, Hassan T. Kinematic hardening rules in uncoupled modeling for multiaxial ratcheting simulation. International Journal of Plasticity. 2001;17(7):885-905. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00031-0]
Bari Sh, Hassan T. An advancement in cyclic plasticity modeling for multiaxial ratcheting simulation. International Journal of Plasticity. 2002;18(7):873-894. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0749-6419(01)00012-2]
Chaboche JL. Constitutive equations for cyclic plasticity and cyclic viscoplasticity. International Journal of Plasticity. 1989;5(3):247-302. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0749-6419(89)90015-6]
Ohno N, Wang JD. Kinematic hardening rules with critical state of dynamic recovery, part I: Formulation and basic features for ratchetting behavior. International Journal of Plasticity. 1993;9(3):375-390. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0749-6419(93)90042-O]
Abdel-Karim M, Ohno N. Kinematic hardening model suitable for ratchetting with steady-state. International Journal of Plasticity. 2000;16(3-4):225-240. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0749-6419(99)00052-2]
Mayama T, Sasaki K, Ishikawa H. Biaxial ratcheting deformation of type 304 stainless steel: Effect of memorization of back stress. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science. 2004;218(9):901-908. [Link] [DOI:10.1243/0954406041991288]
Hassan T, Zhu Y, Matzen VC. Improved ratcheting analysis of piping components. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. 1998;75(8):643-652. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0308-0161(98)00070-2]
Kulkarni SC, Desai YM, Kant T, Reddy GR, Parulekar Y, Vaze KK. Uniaxial and biaxial ratchetting study of SA333 Gr.6 steel at room temperature. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. 2003;80(3):179-185. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0308-0161(03)00029-2]
Chen X, Chen X, Yu D, Gao B. Recent progresses in experimental investigation and finite element analysis of ratcheting in pressurized piping. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. 2013;101:113-142. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijpvp.2012.10.008]
Vishnuvardhan S, Raghava G, Gandhi P, Saravanan M, Goyal S, Arora P, et al. Ratcheting failure of pressurized straight pipes and elbows under reversed bending. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. 2013;105-106:79-89. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijpvp.2013.03.005]
Foroutan M, Ahmadzadeh GR, Varvani Farahani A. Axial and hoop ratcheting assessment in pressurized steel elbow pipes subjected to bending cycles. Thin Walled Structures. 2018;123:317-323. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.tws.2017.11.021]
Chen X, Chen X. Study on ratcheting effect of pressurized straight pipe with local wall thinning using finite element analysis. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. 2016;139-140:69-76. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.03.005]
Palma MD. Modelling of cyclic plasticity for austenitic stainless steels 304L, 316L, 316L(N)-IG. Fusion Engineering and Design. 2016;109-111(Pt A):20-25. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2016.03.064]
Lemaitre J, Chaboche JL. Mechanics of solid materials. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press; 1994. [Link]