Xu B, Yue Sh, Sui Z, Zhang X, Hou Sh, Cao G, et al. What is the choice for supercapacitors: Graphene or graphene oxide?. Energy & Environmental Science. 2011;4(8):2826-2830. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1039/c1ee01198g]
Zhu Y, Murali Sh, Cai W, Li X, Suk JW, Potts JR, et al. Graphene and graphene oxide: Synthesis, properties, and applications. Advanced Materials. 2010;22(35):3906-3924. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1002/adma.201001068]
Du J, Cheng HM. The fabrication, properties, and uses of graphene/polymer composites. Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics. 2012;213(10‐11):1060-1077. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1002/macp.201200029]
Gómez-del Río T, Rodríguez J. Compression yielding of epoxy: Strain rate and temperature effect. Materials & Design. 2012;35:369-373. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.034]
Phan HT. High strain rate behavior of graphene reinforced polyurethane composites [Dissertation]. Columbia: University of Missouri-Columbia; 2012. [
Link]
Shokrieh MM, Esmkhani M, Shahverdi HR, Vahedi F. Effect of graphene nanosheets (GNS) and graphite nanoplatelets (GNP) on the mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites. Science of Advanced Materials. 2013;5(3):260-266. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1166/sam.2013.1453]
Yao H, Hawkins SA, Sue HJ. Preparation of epoxy nanocomposites containing well-dispersed graphene nanosheets. Composites Science and Technology. 2017;146:161-168. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.04.026]
Atif R, Shyha I, Inam F. Modeling and experimentation of multi-layered nanostructured graphene-epoxy nanocomposites for enhanced thermal and mechanical properties. Journal of Composite Materials. 2017;51(2):209-220. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1177/0021998316640060]
Soltannia B, Haji Gholami I, Masajedian S, Mertiny P, Sameoto D, Taheri F. Parametric study of strain rate effects on nanoparticle-reinforced polymer composites. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2016;2016:9841972. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1155/2016/9841972]
Shadlou Sh, Ahmadi-Moghadam B, Taheri F. The effect of strain-rate on the tensile and compressive behavior of graphene reinforced epoxy/nanocomposites. Materials & Design. 2014;59:439-447. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.020]
Chen W, Lu F, Cheng M. Tension and compression tests of two polymers under quasi-static and dynamic loading. Polymer Testing. 2002;21(2):113-121. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/S0142-9418(01)00055-1]
Naik NK, Shankar PJ, Kavala VR, Ravikumar G, Pothnis JR, Arya H. High strain rate mechanical behavior of epoxy under compressive loading: Experimental and modeling studies. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2011;528(3):846-854. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.msea.2010.10.099]
Zarei Darani S, Naghdabadi R, Jokar E, Irajizad A. Experimental study on mechanical properties of graphene oxide/epoxy nonocomposites in different strain rates. Modares Mechanical Engineering. 2017;16(12):61-66. [Persian] [
Link]
Shokrieh MM, Joneidi VA. Characterization and simulation of impact behavior of graphene/polypropylene nanocomposites using a novel strain rate-dependent micromechanics model. Journal of Composite Materials. 2015;49(19):2317-2328. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1177/0021998314545191]
Shokrieh MM, Mosalmani R, Omidi MJ. Strain rate dependent micromechanical modeling of reinforced polymers with carbon nanotubes. Journal of Composite Materials. 2014;48(27):3381-3393. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1177/0021998313509864]
Shokrieh MM, Shamaei Kashani AR, Mosalmani R. A dynamic constitutive-micromechanical model to predict the strain rate-dependent mechanical behavior of carbon nanofiber/epoxy nanocomposites. Iranian Polymer Journal. 2016;25(6):487-501. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1007/s13726-016-0441-9]
Ghaleb ZA, Mariatti M, Ariff ZM. Properties of graphene nanopowder and multi-walled carbon nanotube-filled epoxy thin-film nanocomposites for electronic applications: The effect of sonication time and filler loading. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2014;58:77-83. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.12.002]
Majzoobi GH, Amini Nejad SH, Sabet SA. Role of graphene oxide and sonication time on mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites at high strain rate. Materials Research Express. 2019;6(6):065063. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1088/2053-1591/ab0fde]
Johnson GR, Cook WH. A constitutive model and data for materials subjected to large strains, high strain rates, and high temperatures. The 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, 1983 April 19-21, The Hague, The Netherlands. Welfengarten: Tib; 1983. pp. 541-547. [
Link]
Regis RG. Particle swarm with radial basis function surrogates for expensive black-box optimization. Journal of Computational Science. 2014;5(1):12-23. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.jocs.2013.07.004]
Payandehpeyman J, Majzoobi GH, Bagheri R. Determination of the extended Drucker-Prager parameters using the surrogate-based optimization method for polypropylene nanocomposites. The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design. 2016;51(3):220-232. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1177/0309324715627564]
Mack Y, Goel T, Shyy W, Haftka R. Surrogate model-based optimization framework: A case study in aerospace design. In: Yang Sh, Ong YS, Jin Y, editors. Evolutionary computation in dynamic and uncertain environments. Heidelberg: Springer; 2007. pp. 323-342. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1007/978-3-540-49774-5_14]
Queipo NV, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Goel T, Vaidyanathan R, Tucker PK. Surrogate-based analysis and optimization. Progress in Aerospace Sciences. 2005;41(1):1-28. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.001]
MüLler J, Shoemaker CA, Piché R. SO-MI: A surrogate model algorithm for computationally expensive nonlinear mixed-integer black-box global optimization problems. Computers & Operations Research. 2013;40(5):1383-1400. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.cor.2012.08.022]
Müller J. Surrogate model algorithms for computationally expensive black-box global optimization problems [Dissertation]. Tampere: Tampere University of Technology; 2012. [
Link]
Tian Y, Zhang H, Zhao J, Li T, Bie BX, Luo SN, et al. High strain rate compression of epoxy based nanocomposites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2016;90:62-70. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.06.008]
