مهندسی مکانیک مدرس

مهندسی مکانیک مدرس

اندازه گیری سرعت حباب تیلور به کمک پردازش تصویر

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان
دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
چکیده
هدف از این پژوهش، ایجاد انواع الگو جریان دوفازی و بدست آوردن نقشه الگو جریان برای دو فاز آب و هوا در یک لوله عمودی از جنس پلکسی گلس شفاف به قطر 50 میلی­متر و طول 390 سانتی­متر و محاسبه سرعت میانگین حباب تیلور است. سیستم آزمایشگاهی لازم جهت انجام این پژوهش در آزمایشگاه جریان­های چند­فازی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس توسط تیم تحقیقاتی جریان­های چند­فازی طراحی و ساخته شده است. سه الگوی جریان حبابی، اسلاگ و متلاطم برای 320 سرعت ظاهری مختلف آب و هوا ایجاد و بررسی شدند. برای ایجاد الگوی جریان حبابی در ورودی هوا از یک توزیع­کننده هفت طبقه با قابلیت تغییر در تعداد حباب­های تولید شده، استفاده شده است. تاثیر سرعت ظاهری هر فاز بر الگوی جریان مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت و نقشه الگو جریان برای320 داده مختلف رسم شد. به کمک پردازش تصاویر بدست آمده از دوربین سرعت بالا، سرعت میانگین حباب تیلور برای حالت­های جریاتی مختلف به همراه عدم قطعیت در محاسبه سرعت محاسبه شد. همچنین به کمک نتایج بدست آمده برای 5 سرعت مختلف از فاز مایع نمودار تغییر سرعت متوسط حباب تیلور با افزایش سرعت فاز گازی رسم و با رابطه نیکلین مقایسه شد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Taylor bubble velocity measurement by using image processing

نویسندگان English

mohamadhossein ramezani
Mohammad Mehdi Noroozi
Reza Madahian
Mohammad Reza Ansari
University student
چکیده English

The purpose of this study is to generate two-phase flow patterns and to obtain a flow pattern map for two phases as water and air in a vertical pipe which is made of transparent Plexiglas. The pipe specification is 50 mm diameter and 390 cm length. In this attempt the average velocity of the Taylor bubble will be calculate. In order to facilitate this research work, a two phase flow was designed, built and adjusted at Tarbiat Modares University Two-phase flow laboratory. Three flow patterns as bubbly, slug and churn flow are generated and examined for 320 runs of different superficial velocities of air and water. A seven-layer distributor with the ability to change the number of bubbles produced is used to create a bubbly flow pattern at the air inlet. The effect of the superficial velocities of each phase on the flow pattern was evaluated and a flow pattern map was presented for 320 different data. By processing the images obtained from the high-speed camera, the average Taylor bubble velocity was calculated for different flow conditions with uncertainty in calculating the velocity. Also, for 5 different velocities of the liquid phase, a diagram of the average velocity of Taylor velocity with increasing gas velocity was drawn and compared with the Nicklin correlation which can be found in the literature

کلیدواژه‌ها English

two-phase flow
vertical pipe
experimental method
Flow pattern
Taylor bubble velocity
[1] Y. Taitel, D. Bornea, A. Dukler, Modelling flow pattern transitions for steady upward gas-liquid flow in vertical tubes, AIChE Journal, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 345-354, 1980.
[2] P. Hanafizadeh, S. Ghanbarzadeh, M. H. Saidi, Visual technique for detection of gas–liquid two-phase flow regime in the airlift pump, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Vol. 75, No. 3-4, pp. 327-335, 2011.
[3] Y. Yang, D. Wang, P. Niu, M. Liu, C. Zhang, Measurement of vertical gas-liquid two-phase flow by electromagnetic flowmeter and image processing based on the phase-isolation, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, Vol. 101, pp. 87-100, 2019.
[4] M. Ansari, R. Azadi, Effect of diameter and axial location on upward gas–liquid two-phase flow patterns in intermediate-scale vertical tubes, Annals of Nuclear Energy, Vol. 94, pp. 530-540, 2016.
[5] A. Ohnuki, H. Akimoto, Experimental study on transition of flow pattern and phase distribution in upward air–water two-phase flow along a large vertical pipe, International journal of multiphase flow, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 367-386, 2000.
[6] H.-M. Prasser, M. Beyer, H. Carl, A. Manera, H. Pietruske, P. Schütz, Experiments on upwards gas liquid flow in vertical pipes: FZD, 2007.
[7] H. Funahashi, K. V. Kirkland, K. Hayashi, S. Hosokawa, A. Tomiyama, Interfacial and wall friction factors of swirling annular flow in a vertical pipe, Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 330, pp. 97-105, 2018.
[8] C. Mills, J. Schlegel, Comparison of data processing algorithm performance for optical and conductivity void probes, Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 174-185, 2020.
[9] M. Gui, Z. Liu, B. Liao, T. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Sui, Q. Bi, J. Wang, Void fraction measurements of steam–water two-phase flow in vertical rod bundle: Comparison among different techniques, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, Vol. 109, pp. 109881, 2019.
[10] S. B. Kumar, D. Moslemian, M. P. Duduković, A γ-ray tomographic scanner for imaging voidage distribution in two-phase flow systems, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 61-73, 1995.
[11] M. Da Silva, S. Thiele, L. Abdulkareem, B. Azzopardi, U. Hampel, High-resolution gas–oil two-phase flow visualization with a capacitance wire-mesh sensor, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 191-197, 2010.
[12] M. V. Sardeshpande, S. Harinarayan, V. V. Ranade, Void fraction measurement using electrical capacitance tomography and high speed photography, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, Vol. 94, pp. 1-11, 2015.
[13] B. Azzopardi, L. Abdulkareem, D. Zhao, S. Thiele, M. Da Silva, M. Beyer, A. Hunt, Comparison between electrical capacitance tomography and wire mesh sensor output for air/silicone oil flow in a vertical pipe, Industrial & engineering chemistry research, Vol. 49, No. 18, pp. 8805-8811, 2010.
[14] C. Yang, H. Wang, Z. Cui, Application of electrical resistance tomography in bubble columns for volume fraction measurement, in Proceeding of, IEEE, pp. 1199-1203.
[15] Y. Faraj, M. Wang, ERT investigation on horizontal and vertical counter-gravity slurry flow in pipelines, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 42, pp. 588-606, 2012.
[16] Z. Dang, Y. Zhao, G. Wang, P. Ju, Q. Zhu, X. Yang, R. Bean, M. Ishii, Investigation of the effect of the electrode distance on the impedance void meter performance in the two-phase flow measurement, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, Vol. 101, pp. 283-295, 2019.
[17] J. P. Schlegel, P. Sawant, S. Paranjape, B. Ozar, T. Hibiki, M. Ishii, Void fraction and flow regime in adiabatic upward two-phase flow in large diameter vertical pipes, Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 239, No. 12, pp. 2864-2874, 2009.
[18] E. Rosa, B. Flora, M. Souza, Design and performance prediction of an impedance void meter applied to the petroleum industry, Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 055304, 2012.
[19] J. Jia, A. Babatunde, M. Wang, Void fraction measurement of gas–liquid two-phase flow from differential pressure, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, Vol. 41, pp. 75-80, 2015.
[20] D. Nicklin, Two-phase flow in vertical tubes, Trans, Inst. Chem. Engr., Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 61-68, 1962.