1. Mosaffa AH, Zareei A. Proposal and thermoeconomic analysis of geothermal flash binary power plants utilizing different types of organic flash cycle. Geothermics. 2018;72:47-63. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.geothermics.2017.10.011]
2. Yari M. Exergetic analysis of various types of geothermal power plants. Renewable Energy. 2010;35(1):112-121. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2009.07.023]
3. Badr O, O'Callaghan PW, Probert SD. Rankine-cycle systems for harnessing power from low-grade energy sources. Applied Energy. 1990;36(4):263-292. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/0306-2619(90)90002-U]
4. Lin D, Zhu Q, Li X. Thermodynamic comparative analyses between (organic) Rankine cycle and Kalina cycle. Energy Procedia. 2015;75:1618-1623. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.385]
5. Hettiarachchi HDM, Golubovic M, Worek WM, Ikegami Y. The performance of the Kalina Cycle System 11(KCS-11) with low-temperature heat sources. Journal of Energy Resources Technology. 2007;129(3):243-247. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1115/1.2748815]
6. Jalilinasrabady S, Itoi R, Valdimarsson P, Saevarsdottir G, Fujii H. Flash cycle optimization of Sabalan geothermal power plant employing exergy concept. Geothermics. 2012;43:75-82. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.geothermics.2012.02.003]
7. Aali A, Pourmahmood N, Zare V. Proposal and analysis of a new cycle for power generation from Sabalan geothermal wells. Journal of Mechanical Engineering of Tabriz University. 2017;47(3):139-147. [Persian] [
Link]
8. Aali A, Pourmahmood N, Zare V. Exergy analysis of a new proposed cycle for power generation from sabalan geothermal wells. Journal of Mechanical Engineering of Tabriz University. 2018;48(1):251-260. [Persian] [
Link]
9. Aali A, Pourmahmood N, Zare V. Exergoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel combined flash-binary cycle for Sabalan geothermal power plant in Iran. Energy Conversion and Management. 2017;143:377-390. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.025]
10. Abdolalipouradl M, Khalilarya S, Jafarmadar S. Exergy analysis of a new proposal combined cycle from Sabalan geothermal source. Modares Mechanical Engineering. 2018;18(4):11-22. [Persian] [
Link]
11. Ozgur T, Yakaryılmaz AC. A review: Exergy analysis of PEM and PEM fuel cell based CHP systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2018;43(38):17993-8000. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.106]
12. Orhan MF, Babu BS. Investigation of an integrated hydrogen production system based on nuclear and renewable energy sources: Comparative evaluation of hydrogen production options with a regenerative fuel cell system. Energy. 2015;88:801-820. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.009]
13. Pham AT, Baba T, Shudo T. Efficient hydrogen production from aqueous methanol in a PEM electrolyzer with porous metal flow field: Influence of change in grain diameter and material of porous metal flow field. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2013;38(24):9945-9953. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.05.171]
14. Garcia-Valverde R, Espinosa N, Urbina A. Simple PEM water electrolyser model and experimental validation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2012;37(2):1927-1938. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.09.027]
15. Ni M, Leung MKH, Leung DYC. Energy and exergy analysis of hydrogen production by a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzer plant. Energy Conversion and Management. 2008;49(10):2748-2756. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2008.03.018]
16. Ahmadi P, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Energy and exergy analyses of hydrogen production via solar-boosted ocean thermal energy conversion and PEM electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2013;38(4):1795-1805. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.025]
17. Ahmadi P, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Multi-objective optimization of a novel solar-based multigeneration energy system. Solar Energy. 2014;108:576-591. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.solener.2014.07.022]
18. Ranjbar SF, Nami H, Khorshid A, Mohammadpour H. Hydrogen production using waste heat recovery of MATIANT non-emission system via PEM electrolysis. Modares Mechanical Engineering. 2016;16(10):42-50. [Persian] [
Link]
19. Yilmaz C, Kanoglu M, Bolatturk A, Gadalla M. Economics of hydrogen production and liquefaction by geothermal energy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2012;37(2):2058-2069. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.06.037]
20. Ghaebi H, Farhang B. Using various organic Rankine cycles for production of power and hydrogen by incorporating geothermal energy and proton exchange membrane (A comparative study). Modares Mechanical Engineering. 2016;16(6):138-148. [Persian] [
Link]
21. Ratlamwala TAH, Dincer I. Comparative efficiency assessment of novel multi-flash integrated geothermal systems for power and hydrogen production. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2012;48:359-366. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.04.039]
22. Ghaebi H, Farhang B, Parikhani T, Rostamzadeh H. Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a cogeneration system for power and hydrogen production purpose based on TRR method and using low grade geothermal source. Geothermics. 2018;71:132-145. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.geothermics.2017.08.011]
23. Cengel YA, Boles MA. Thermodynamics: An engineering approach. 7th Edition. New York: McGraw- Hill; 2011. [
Link]
24. Yari M, Mehr AS, Zare V, Mahmoudi SMS, Rosen MA. Exergoeconomic comparison of TLC (trilateral Rankine cycle), ORC (organic Rankine cycle) and Kalina cycle using a low grade heat source. Energy. 2015;83:712-722 [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2015.02.080]
25. Ahrendts J. Reference states. Energy. 1980;5(8-9):666-677. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/0360-5442(80)90087-0]
26. Bejan A, Tsatsaronis G, Moran M. Thermal design and optimization. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 1996. [
Link]
27. Shokati N, Ranjbar F, Yari M. Comparative and parametric study of double flash and single flash/ORC combined cycles based on exergoeconomic criteria. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2015;91:479-495. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.08.031]
28. Elsayed A, Embaye M, AL-Dadah R, Mahmoud S, Rezk A. Thermodynamic performance of Kalina Cycle System 11 (KCS11): feasibility of using alternative zeotropic mixtures. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies. 2013;8(S1):69-78. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1093/ijlct/ctt020]