Volume 19, Issue 10 (October 2019)                   Modares Mechanical Engineering 2019, 19(10): 2551-2558 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Panahi liavoli R, Bakhshi Jooybari M, Gorji H, Mirnia M J. Determination of Process Window of St12 Steel Sheet in Single Point Incremental Forming of a Truncated Pyramid by Experimental Method. Modares Mechanical Engineering 2019; 19 (10) :2551-2558
URL: http://mme.modares.ac.ir/article-15-20510-en.html
1- 1Mechanical Engineering Depatment, Advanced Material Forming Research Center, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, Iran
2- Advanced Material Forming Reserach Center, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology , bakhshi@nit.ac.ir
3- Advanced Material Forming Reserach Center, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology
Abstract:   (3534 Views)
Incremental forming is considered as one of the rapid prototyping methods and has a high degree of flexibility and cost-effectiveness at low production volume. Meanwhile, the lack of technical knowledge has challenged the use of this method in the industry. One of the things that can help the actual usage of this process is the suitable process window; a window used to determine maximum tearing depth of the sheet with respect to the material, thickness and wall angle. In this study, firstly, the formability of low-carbon steel sheet, St12, with the thicknesses of 1.25 and 1.50 mm in single point incremental forming of a truncated pyramid with different constant wall angles has been investigated experimentally. Then, it is compared with the formability of the truncated pyramid with variable wall angles under two different wall geometries. Based on the experimental results, the process windows are presented in terms of the maximum depth and wall angle and compared to each other under different circumstances. The results showed that the critical wall angle for St12 sheet in incremental forming of a truncated pyramid with a fixed wall angle differs from the pyramid with variable wall angle, but doesn't depend on the size of the pyramid base. The critical wall angle for the fixed and variable wall angle pyramids was obtained 67⁰ and 75⁰, respectively. For a pyramid with a fixed wall angle, the thickness distribution of the wall is almost constant, while for a pyramid with a variable wall, it varies along the path.
Full-Text [PDF 1505 kb]   (3416 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Forming of metal sheets
Received: 2018/05/6 | Accepted: 2019/03/4 | Published: 2019/10/22

1. Matsubara S. Incremental backward bulge forming of a sheet metal with a hemispherical head tool-a study of a numerical control forming system II. Journal of the Japan Society for Technology of Plasticity. 1994;35(406):1311-1316. [Link]
2. Kim TJ, Yang DY. Improvement of formability for the incremental sheet metal forming process. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 2000;42(7):1271-1286. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0020-7403(99)00047-8]
3. Shim MS, Park JJ. The formability of aluminum sheet in incremental forming. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2001;113(1-3):654-658. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00679-3]
4. Kim YH, Park JJ. Effect of process parameters on formability in incremental forming of sheet metal. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2002;130-131:42-46. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00788-4]
5. Ham M, Jeswiet J. Forming limit curves in single point incremental forming. CIRP Annals. 2007;56(1):277-280. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.064]
6. Hussain G, Gao L. A novel method to test the thinning limits of sheet metals in negative incremental forming. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 2007;47(3-4):419-435. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.06.015]
7. Silva MB, Nielsen PS, Bay N, Martins PAF. Failure mechanisms in single-point incremental forming of metals. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2011;56(9-12):893-903. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s00170-011-3254-1]
8. Seong DY, Haque MZ, Kim JB, Stoughton TB, Yoon JW. Suppression of necking in incremental sheet forming. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 2014;51(15-16):2840-2849. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.04.007]
9. Kurra S, Regalla SP. Experimental and numerical studies on formability of extra-deep drawing steel in incremental sheet metal forming. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2014;3(2):158-171. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jmrt.2014.03.009]
10. Barani Shooli A, Amini Najafabadi S, Farzin M. Experimental formability investigation of titanium alloy in hot incremental sheet forming process. Modares Mechanical Engineering. 2015;15(6):107-114. [Persian] [Link]
11. Nikdooz AH, Mirnia MJ, Baseri H. Study of formability of aluminum truncated pyramid in single-stage and two-stage incremental sheet forming. Modares Mechanical Engineering. 2016;16(5):210-220. [Persian] [Link]
12. Mirnia MJ, Shamsari M. Numerical prediction of failure in single point incremental forming using a phenomenological ductile fracture criterion. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2017;244:17-43. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.01.029]
13. Mirnia MJ, Vahdani M, Shamsari M. Ductile damage and deformation mechanics in multistage single point incremental forming. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 2018;136:396-412. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.12.051]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.