Volume 20, Issue 6 (June 2020)                   Modares Mechanical Engineering 2020, 20(6): 1487-1500 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Fallah M, Medghalchi Z. Anti-Insulation in Building Energy Consumption; Comparison of Eight Climates of Iran. Modares Mechanical Engineering 2020; 20 (6) :1487-1500
URL: http://mme.modares.ac.ir/article-15-35089-en.html
1- Research Institute of Applied Power System Studies, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran , mfallah@azaruniv.ac.ir
2- Research Institute of Applied Power System Studies, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract:   (3383 Views)

Recent energy-saving policies in Iran led to more insulation implementation in buildings. Therefore, the occurrence of anti-insulation increases in the building industry. The anti-insulation phenomenon is the reverse function of insulation that causes cooling energy increment rather than energy saving. This phenomenon is an important and effective factor in energy consumption and the resident’s comfort. However, it has not been considered in thermal insulation studies worthily. Therefore, in this study, the anti-insulation occurrence temperature set-point is detected under eight climates of Iran by simulation in the EnergyPlus software. Four thickness of polystyrene insulation is evaluated under three insulating methods including external, mid and internal insulation. Results indicate that the anti-insulation occurs in six climates of Iran. Furthermore, cold and marine climates are more likely to anti-insulation occurrence than hot climates. The anti-insulation happens at a lower temperature by increasing the insulation thickness. In external insulation, due to usage of the wall’s thermal mass, anti-insulation occurs in high temperatures compared with mid and internal insulation methods.

Full-Text [PDF 790 kb]   (1961 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Plumbing & Air Conditioning
Received: 2019/07/23 | Accepted: 2020/01/19 | Published: 2020/06/20

References
1. Shafiezadeh M, Amini F, Ghahremani N, Khodi M. An Overview 29 Years Energy Statistics of the Country. Tehran: Deputy of Electricity and Energy; 2018. [Persian]. [Link]
2. Unknown. 19th issue of the National Building Regulation. Tehran: Road, Housing and Development Research Center; 2011. [Persian] [Link]
3. Adamczyk J, Dylewski R. Analysis of the sensitivity of the ecological effects for the investment based on the thermal insulation of the building: A Polish case study. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017;162:856-864. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.123]
4. Friess WA, Rakhshan K, Hendawi TA, Tajerzadeh S. Wall insulation measures for residential villas in Dubai: A case study in energy efficiency. Energy and Buildings. 2012;44:26-32. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.10.005]
5. Huo H, Shao J, Huo H. Contributions of energy-saving technologies to building energy saving in different climatic regions of China. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2017;124:1159-1168. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.06.065]
6. Roumi S, Razi Astaraei F, Ghasempour R, Yousefi H, Hamlehdar M, Razavi SM. New insulation replacement in buildings' walls and its impact on air pollution reduction in Tehran. Intelligent Buildings International. 2019;11(2):65-74. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/17508975.2017.1339586]
7. Vincelas FFC, Ghislain T, Robert T. Influence of the types of fuel and building material on energy savings into building in tropical region of Cameroon. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2017;122:806-819. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.04.028]
8. Açıkkalp E, Kandemir SY. A method for determining optimum insulation thickness: Combined economic and environmental method. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress. 2019;11:249-253. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.tsep.2019.04.004]
9. Alsayed MF, Tayeh RA. Life cycle cost analysis for determining optimal insulation thickness in Palestinian buildings. Journal of Building Engineering. 2019;22:101-112. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jobe.2018.11.018]
10. Özel G, Açıkkalp E, Görgün B, Yamık H, Caner N. Optimum insulation thickness determination using the environmental and life cycle cost analyses based entransy approach. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 2015;11:87-91. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2015.06.004]
11. Akbari Paydar M, Mohammad Kari B, Maerefat M, Abravesh M. Optimum insulation thickness based on energy carriers different tariffs in climatic condition of Tehran. Modares Mechanical Engineering. 2019;19(6):1447-1456. [Link]
12. ASHRAE. Standard 55-2017: Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta: ASHRAE; 2017. [Link]
13. Ramin H, Hanafizadeh P, Akhavan Behabadi MA. Thermal, economical and environmental optimization of insulation thickness in residential building's wall. Modares Mechanical Engineering. 2016;16(13):252-255. [Link]
14. Hoseini R, Jahangiri P, Bahman Pour D. The economic analysis of the use of thermal insulation and double-walled window in a residential unit. Research Journal of Mechanical Engineering of Iran. 2012;13(1 suppl 23):20-31. Persian. [Link]
15. Khodakarami J, Ghobadi P. Optimization of energy consumption in an administration building equipped with smart management system. Energy Engineering & Management. 2017;6(2):12-23. Persian. [Link]
16. Baniassadi A, Sajadi B, Amidpour M, Noori N. Economic optimization of PCM and insulation layer thickness in residential buildings. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 2016;14:92-99. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2016.01.008]
17. Amiri Rad E, Fallahi E. Optimizing the insulation thickness of external wall by a novel 3E (energy, environmental, economic) method. Construction and Building Materials. 2019;205:196-212. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.006]
18. Amirifard F, Sharif SA, Nasiri F. Application of passive measures for energy conservation in buildings- a review. Advances in Building Energy Research. 2018;13(2):282-315. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/17512549.2018.1488617]
19. Barrios G, Huelsz G, Rojas J. Thermal performance of envelope wall/roofs of intermittent air-conditioned rooms. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2012;40:1-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.01.051]
20. Kolaitis DI, Malliotakis E, Kontogeorgos DA, Mandilaras I, Katsourinis DI, Founti MA. Comparative assessment of internal and external thermal insulation systems for energy efficient retrofitting of residential buildings. Energy and Buildings. 2013;64:123-132. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.04.004]
21. Meng X, Luo T, Gao Y, Zhang L, Huang X, Hou C, et al. Comparative analysis on thermal performance of different wall insulation forms under the air-conditioning intermittent operation in summer. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2018;130:429-438. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.11.042]
22. Yuan L, Kang Y, Wang S, Zhong K. Effects of thermal insulation characteristics on energy consumption of buildings with intermittently operated air-conditioning systems under real time varying climate conditions. Energy and Buildings. 2017;155:559-570. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.09.012]
23. Zhang L, Luo T, Meng X, Wang Y, Hou C, Long E. Effect of the thermal insulation layer location on wall dynamic thermal response rate under the air-conditioning intermittent operation. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering. 2017;10:79-85. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.csite.2017.04.001]
24. Nooraei M, Littlewood J, Evans N. Passive cooling strategies for multi-storey residential buildings in Tehran, Iran and Swansea, UK. In: Hakansson A, Höjer M, Howlett R, Jain L, editors. Sustainability in energy and buildings. 22nd vol. Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-36645-1_58]
25. Ozarisoy B, Elsharkawy H. Assessing overheating risk and thermal comfort in state-of-the-art prototype houses that combat exacerbated climate change in UK. Energy and Buildings. 2019;187:201-217. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.01.030]
26. Psomas T, Heiselberg P, Duer K, Bjørn E. Overheating risk barriers to energy renovations of single family houses: Multicriteria analysis and assessment. Energy and Buildings. 2016;117:138-148. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.02.031]
27. D'Agostino D, de'Rossi F, Marigliano M, Marino C, Minichiello F. Evaluation of the optimal thermal insulation thickness for an office building in different climates by means of the basic and modified "cost-optimal" methodology. Journal of Building Engineering. 2019;24:100743. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100743]
28. Brambilla A, Jusselme T. Preventing overheating in offices through thermal inertial properties of compressed earth bricks: A study on a real scale prototype. Energy and Buildings. 2017;156:281-292. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.09.070]
29. Idris YM, Mae M. Anti-insulation mitigation by altering the envelope layers' configuration. Energy and Buildings. 2017;141:186-204. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.02.025]
30. Rezaeiyan N. Building Energy Lable. Tehran: National Iranian Gas Company; 2016. Persian. [Link]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.