Volume 20, Issue 9 (September 2020)                   Modares Mechanical Engineering 2020, 20(9): 2263-2274 | Back to browse issues page

‎ 20.1001.1.10275940.1399.20.9.1.8

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Farahzadi H, Hashemabadi S, Shirvani M. Experimental Investigation and CFD Simulation of Vortex Flow Meter Performance in Gas-Solid Two-Phase Flow. Modares Mechanical Engineering 2020; 20 (9) :2263-2274
URL: http://mme.modares.ac.ir/article-15-35637-en.html
Experimental Investigation and CFD Simulation of Vortex Flow Meter Performance in Gas-Solid Two-Phase Flow
H. Farahzadi1 , S.H. Hashemabadi * 2, M. Shirvani1
1- School of Chemical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Iran University of Science & Technology, Tehran, Iran
2- School of Chemical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Iran University of Science & Technology, Tehran, Iran , hashemabadi@iust.ac.ir
Abstract:   (1823 Views)
Using vortex flowmeter is affordable, in addition, simple installation, high reliability, and high accuracy are some advantages of the vortex flowmeter. Vortex flowmeter works based on the vortex shedding principle, hence, the presence of particles in gas-solid flows may results in modulation in the turbulence intensity of the carrier phase and manipulate vortex shedding generated by a bluff body. In this study, the performance of the vortex flowmeter in the presence of particles with different sizes, density, solid volume fraction, and solid mass loading was studied with CFD simulation. The results indicated that the volume fraction and particles diameter are two significant parameters that affect vortex frequency. The vortex frequency is proportional to the velocity of gas flow and volume flow rate is calculated by Q= VA where V is average velocity in a pipe section with the area of A. Notwithstanding the neutral effect of microparticles on vortex frequency, moderate particles lessen the vortex frequency approximately by 20%. To coincide with the increase of solid volume fraction, the vortex frequency will descend, and in the high level of solid volume fraction, the vortex pattern goes to reach the instability. Since the size and volume fraction of the particles affects the frequency and consequently velocity, the gas flow rate measured by the vortex flowmeter is influenced by the presence of the particles. The numerical results have been validated with experimental data. The maximum relative error between the numerical simulation and the corresponding experimental data is 0.46% and 6.72 % for single-phase and gas-solid two-phase flows, respectively.
Keywords: Vortex Flowmeter, Gas-Solid Two-Phase Flow, Vortex Shedding Frequency, CFD Simulation
Full-Text [PDF 1114 kb]   (2188 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD)
Received: 2019/08/13 | Accepted: 2020/06/27 | Published: 2020/09/20
References
1. Venugopal A, Agrawal A, Prabhu SV. Review on vortex flowmeter-Designer prespective. Sensors and Actuators A. 2011;70:8-23. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.sna.2011.05.034]
2. El-Wahed AK, Sproston JL. The influence of shedder shape on the performance of the electrostatic vortex flowmeter. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation. 1991;2(3):169-179. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0955-5986(91)90029-Q]
3. Venugopal A, Agrawal A, Prabhu SV. On the linearity, turndown ratio and shape of the bluff body for vortex flowmeter. Measurement. 2019;137:477-483. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.measurement.2019.02.001]
4. Peng BH, Miau JJ, Bao F, Weng LD, Chao CC, Hsu CC. Performance of vortex shedding from a circular cylinder with a slit normal to the stream. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation. 2012;25:54-62. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2011.07.003]
5. Olsen JF, Rajagopalan S. Vortex shedding behind modified circular cylinders. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2000;86(1):56-63. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0167-6105(00)00003-9]
6. Peng J, Fang M. Response of a dual triangulate bluff body vortex flowmeter to oscillatory flow. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation. 2013;35:16-27. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2013.11.001]
7. Peng J, Fu X, Chen Y. Flow measurement by a new type vortex flowmeter of dual triangulate bluff body. Sensors and Actuators A. 2004;115:53-59. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.sna.2004.03.020]
8. Musić M, Ahić-Džokić M, Džemić Z. A new approach to detection of vortices using ultrasound. Flow measurement and Instrumentation. 2015;42:40-46. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2015.01.001]
9. Venugopal A, Agrawal A, Prabhu SV. Performance evaluation of piezoelectric and differential pressure sensor for vortex flowmeters. Measurement. 2014;50:10-18. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.measurement.2013.12.018]
10. Elghobashi S. On predicting particle-laden turbulent flows. Applied Scientific Research. 1994; 52:309-329. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/BF00936835]
11. Bayoudh M, Touati H, N'Ticha HB. Study of the effect of particles on the kinetic parameters of a turbulent two-phase flow. Energy Procedia. 2019;162:201-10. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2019.04.022]
12. Squires KD, Eaton JK. Particle response and turbulent modification in isotropic turbulence. Physics of Fluids A. 1990;2(7):1191-11203. [Link] [DOI:10.1063/1.857620]
13. Zhang Y, Reese JM. Particle-gas turbulence interactions in a kinetic theory approach to granular flows. International Journal of Multiphase Flow. 2001;27(11):1945-1964. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0301-9322(01)00039-8]
14. Gidaspow D, Bezburuah R, Ding J. Hydrodynamics of circulating fluidized beds: kinetic theory approach. In: 7th Fluidization Conference;1992, 3-8 May: Gold Coast, Australia. Chicago: Department of Chemical Engineerin. [Link]
15. Miao Z, Kuang S, Zughbi H, Yu A. CFD simulation of dilute-phase pneumatic conveying of powders. Powder Technology. 2019;349(1):70-83. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.powtec.2019.03.031]
16. Benavides A, Wachem BV. Numerical simulation and validation of dilute turbulent gas-particle flow with inelastic collisions and turbulence modulation. Powder Technology. 2008;182(2):294-306. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.powtec.2007.06.028]
17. Zhang H, Huang Y, Sun Z. A study of mass flow rate measurement based on the vortex shedding principle. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation. 2006;17(1):29-38. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2005.08.002]
18. Tsuji Y, Morilawa Y, Shiomi H. LDV measurements of an air-solid two-phase flow in a vertical pipe. Journal of Fluid Mechanic. 1984;139:417-434. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/S0022112084000422]
19. Ferrante A, Elghobashi S. On the physical mechanisms of two-phase coupling in particle-laden isotropic turbulence. Physics of Fluids. 2003 Feb;15(2):315-329. [Link] [DOI:10.1063/1.1532731]
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.