Volume 20, Issue 6 (June 2020)                   Modares Mechanical Engineering 2020, 20(6): 1701-1708 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Bayat M, Abootorabi M. Estimation of Energy Consumption in Milling Process with Minimum Quantity Lubrication and Comparison with Wet Cutting State. Modares Mechanical Engineering 2020; 20 (6) :1701-1708
URL: http://mme.modares.ac.ir/article-15-40697-en.html
1- Mechanical Engineering Faculty, Technical & Engineering Complex, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
2- Mechanical Engineering Faculty, Technical & Engineering Complex, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran , abootorabi@yazd.ac.ir
Abstract:   (4681 Views)
Reducing energy consumption in production is an urgent need. In manufacturing processes, especially machining, more than 90% of the environmental impacts are due to energy consumption in machine tools. The purpose of the present study is to estimate and compare the energy consumption of AISI 316 steel milling process in conventional (wet) and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) modes as well as the experimental measurement of energy consumption in each of these two modes. Studies have suggested different types of energy consumption modeling in machining but few studies have been conducted on the use of these modeling techniques and the minimum quantity lubrication method has been rarely compared with the wet state in terms of energy consumption. Empirical experiments were used to confirm the modeling performed to predict energy consumption in the milling process. The results show that the proposed method is efficient and practical for predicting energy consumption with 5% error. After confirming the modeling, using two levels for feed rate and spindle speed and applying full factorial design of experiments, energy and power consumption in MQL and wet cutting modes using the power meter connected to the input 3-phase power cable of the milling machine were experimentally measured. Energy consumption in the minimum quantity lubrication method was decreased by 16% compared to the wet state. The average power consumption in MQL milling is 33% lower than in wet milling.
Full-Text [PDF 497 kb]   (2220 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Machining
Received: 2020/02/14 | Accepted: 2020/03/9 | Published: 2020/06/20

References
1. iea.org [Internet]. US: World electricity consumption in 2011; 2013 [Cited 2013 August 31]. Available from: www.iea.org/statistics/statisticssearch/report/country/Worldproduct/electricityandheat. [Link]
2. Damink H [Internet]. Netherlands: SME energy checkup; making the most out of energy (SME ENERGYCHECKUP); 2017 [Cited 2016 February 12]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/intelligent/projects/en/projects/sme-energycheckup [Link]
3. 3 CECIMO, 2009. Concept Description for CECIMO's Self-Regulatory Initiative (SRI) for the Sector Specific Implementation of the Directive 2005/32/EC [Cited Unknown Novamber 11] Available from: https://www.eupnetwork.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Produktgruppen/Lots/Working_Documents/Lot_ENTR_05_machine_tools/draft_self_regulation_machine_tools_2009-10.pdf [Link]
4. Kordonowy DN. A power assessment of machining tools [Dissertation]. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2002. [Link]
5. Dahmus JB, Gutowski TG. An environmental analysis of machining. In: ASME 2004 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition. ASME 2004 International mechanical engineering congress and exposition; 2004 Jan 1; American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2004. pp. 643-652. [Link]
6. Gutowski T, Dahmus J, Thiriez A, editors. Electrical energy requirements for manufacturing processes. 13th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering; 2006 May 31-2 Jun; Lueven, Belgium. Lueven: CIRP International Leuven; 2006. pp. 623-628. [Link]
7. Li W, Zein A, Kara S, Herrmann C. An investigation into fixed energy consumption of machine tools. In: Hesselbach J, Herrmann Ch, editors. Glocalized solutions for sustainability in manufacturing. Braunschweig 2011: Proceedings of the 18th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering, Technical University of Braunschweig; 2011 May 2-4; Braunschweig, Germany. Berlin: Springer; 2011. pp. 268-273. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-19692-8_47]
8. Campatelli G, Lorenzini L, Scippa A. Optimization of process parameters using a response surface method for minimizing power consumption in the milling of carbon steel. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2014;66:309-316. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.025]
9. Mori M, Fujishima M, Inamasu Y, Oda Y. A study on energy efficiency improvement for machine tools. CIRP Annals. 2011;60(1):145-148. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.099]
10. He Y, Liu F, Wu T, Zhong FP, Peng B. Analysis and estimation of energy consumption for numerical control machining. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 2012;226(2):255-266. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0954405411417673]
11. Diaz N, Helu M, Jarvis A, Tonissen S, Dornfeld D, Schlosser R. Strategies for minimum energy operation for precision machining [Internet]. California: Green manufacturing and sustainable manufacturing partnership; 2009 [Cited 2009 July 8]. Available from: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/794866g5#main [Link]
12. Aramcharoen A, Mativenga PT. Critical factors in energy demand modelling for CNC milling and impact of toolpath strategy. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2014;78:63-74. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.065]
13. Khan MMA, Mithu MAH, Dhar NR. Effects of minimum quantity lubrication on turning AISI 9310 alloy steel using vegetable oil-based cutting fluid. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2009;209(15-16):5573-5583. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.05.014]
14. Hassanpour H, Rasti R, Sadeghi MH, Saadatbakhsh MH, Omiddodman AR. Effect of cutting fluid application on surface roughness in hard milling of 4340-alloyed steel. Modares Mechanical Engineering. 2015;14(14):50-60. [Persian] [Link]
15. Nayeri MR, Abootorabi Zarchi MM, Haddad Zade M. The effect of minimum quantity lubrication on surface roughness in hard turning of 100Cr6 bearing steel with Nano-CBN tool. Modares Mechanical Engineering. 2017;17(3):263-269, 2017 [Persian] [Link]
16. Kalpakjain S, Schmid SR. Manufacturing processes for engineering materials. 6th Edition. London: Pearson; 2016. [Link]
17. Walker T. MQL Handbook. Michigan: Unist Inc; 2013. pp. 1-40. [Link]
18. Sarıkaya M, Güllü A. Taguchi design and response surface methodology based analysis of machining parameters in CNC turning under MQL. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2014;65:604-616. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.040]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.