Volume 20, Issue 8 (August 2020)
Modares Mechanical Engineering 2020, 20(8): 2159-2169 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Shabanpour M, Fallahi Arezoodar A. Effect of Strain Rate Investigation on Forming Limit Diagram of Al-Cu Two-Layer Sheet. Modares Mechanical Engineering 2020; 20 (8) :2159-2169
URL: http://mme.modares.ac.ir/article-15-42028-en.html
URL: http://mme.modares.ac.ir/article-15-42028-en.html
1- Mechanical Engineering Department, Mechanical Engineering Faculty, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
2- Mechanical Engineering Department, Mechanical Engineering Faculty, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran ,afallahi@aut.ac.ir
2- Mechanical Engineering Department, Mechanical Engineering Faculty, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran ,
Abstract: (2351 Views)
The use of two-layer sheets to improve mechanical properties such as ductility and strength and to improve chemical properties such as corrosion resistance has led to an increasing number of such materials in the industry. In this study, the formability of aluminum-copper two-layer sheets at a high strain rates is investigated by electromagnetic forming method. The simulation of electromagnetic forming of the two-layer sheet was performed at high strain rate using Maxwell and Abaqus software. By making coil and die and using sheets with different geometries and grids on the sheets, the forming limit diagrams (FLD) was also extracted experimentally. The simulation results showed that the electromagnetic pressure applied on the sheet in CA lay-up was 19% higher than in AC lay-up. Using the second derivative of strain criterion, the FLD of aluminum-copper two-layer sheet was derived. The FLD of aluminum-copper two-layer sheet with an initial thickness of 0.5mm is 30% higher in the AC lay-up than in CA lay-up. The reason for this improvement is that in the AC lay-up the sheet with more ductility (copper) is in the outer layer and has greater resistance to tensile stress and necking. The outer layer with better ductility can improve the ductility of the two-layer sheet. The FLD of aluminum-copper two-layer sheets has improved 120% in right-hand side and 55% in left-hand side at high strain rates compared to static conditions. There is about a 6% differences between the simulation and experimental results for forming limit diagram.
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Forming of metal sheets
Received: 2020/04/12 | Accepted: 2020/06/9 | Published: 2020/08/15
Received: 2020/04/12 | Accepted: 2020/06/9 | Published: 2020/08/15
References
1. Karajibani E, Hashemi R, Sedighi M. Forming limit diagram of aluminum-copper two-layer sheets: Numerical simulations and experimental verifications. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2017;90(9-12):2713-2722. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s00170-016-9585-1]
2. Hashemi R, Karajibani E. Forming limit diagram of Al-Cu two-layer metallic sheets considering the Marciniak and Kuczynski theory. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 2018;232(5):848-854. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0954405416654419]
3. Jalali Aghchai A, Shakeri M, Mollaei-Dariani B. Theoretical and experimental formability study of two-layer metallic sheet (Al1100/St12). Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 2008;222(9):1131-1138. [Link] [DOI:10.1243/09544054JEM1140]
4. Gerdooei M, Mollaei Dariani B. Strain-rate-dependent forming limit diagrams for sheet metals. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 2008;222(12):1651-1659. [Link] [DOI:10.1243/09544054JEM1193]
5. Seth M, Vohnout VJ, Daehn GS. Formability of steel sheet in high velocity impact. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2005;168(3):390-400. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.08.032]
6. Shabanpour M, Fallahi Arezoodar A. Multi-objective optimization of the depth of bead and tearing in electromagnetic tube compression forming. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2016;87(1-4):867-875. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s00170-016-8519-2]
7. Psyk V, Risch D, Kinsey BL, Tekkaya AE, Kleiner M. Electromagnetic forming-a review. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2011;211(5):787-829. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.12.012]
8. Takatsu N, Kato M, Sato K, Tobe T. High-speed forming of metal sheets by electromagnetic force. JSME International Journal Ser 3, Vibration, Control Engineering, Engineering for Industry. 1988;31(1):142-148. [Link] [DOI:10.1299/jsmec1988.31.142]
9. Correia JPM, Siddiqui MA, Ahzi S, Belouettar S, Davies R. A simple model to simulate electromagnetic sheet free bulging process. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 2008;50(10-11):1466-1475. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2008.08.008]
10. Golovashchenko SF. Material formability and coil design in electromagnetic forming. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance. 2007;16(3):314-320. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11665-007-9058-7]
11. Li C, Liu D, Yu H, Ji Z. Research on formability of 5052 aluminum alloy sheet in a quasi-static-dynamic tensile process. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 2009;49(2):117-124. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.10.006]
12. Takuda H, Mori K, Fujimoto H, Hatta N. Prediction of forming limit in deep drawing of Fe/Al laminated composite sheets using ductile fracture criterion. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 1996;60(1-4):291-296. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0924-0136(96)02344-8]
13. Lang L, Danckert J, Nielsen KB. Multi-layer sheet hydroforming: Experimental and numerical investigation into the very thin layer in the middle. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2005;170(3):524-535. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.033]
14. Tseng HC, Hung C, Huang CC. An analysis of the formability of aluminum/copper clad metals with different thicknesses by the finite element method and experiment. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2010;49(9):1029-1036. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s00170-009-2446-4]
15. Bagherzadeh S, Mirnia MJ, Mollaei Dariani B. Numerical and experimental investigations of hydro-mechanical deep drawing process of laminated aluminum/steel sheets. Journal of Manufacturing Processes. 2015;18:131-140. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.03.004]
16. Darabi R, Deilami Azodi H, Bagherzadeh S. Investigation into the effect of material properties and arrangement of each layer on the formability of bimetallic sheets. Journal of Manufacturing Processes. 2017;29:133-148. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.07.022]
17. Zahedi A, Mollaei Dariani B, Mirnia MJ. Experimental determination and numerical prediction of necking and fracture forming limit curves of laminated Al/Cu sheets using a damage plasticity model. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 2019;153-154:341-358. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.02.002]
18. Shabanpour M, Fallahi Arezoodar A. Numerical and experimental investigation of electromagnetic inward tube forming in coupled method. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Amirkabir. 2016;48(2):215-226. [Persian] [Link]
19. Johnson GR, Cook WH. A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. In: American Defense Preparedness Association. Seventh International Symposium on Ballistics: Proceedings: The Hague, the Netherlands, 19-21 April 1983. Unknwon City: American Defense Preparedness Association; 1983. [Link]
20. Johnson GR, Cook WH. Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 1985;21(1):31-48. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9]
21. Pierazzo E, Artemieva NA, Asphaug E, Baldwin EC, Cazamias J, Coker RF, et al. Validation of numerical codes for impact and explosion cratering: Impacts on strengthless and metal targets. Meteoritics & Planetary Science. 2008;43(12):1917-1938. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb00653.x]
22. Li Y, Luo M, Gerlach J, Wierzbicki T. Prediction of shear-induced fracture in sheet metal forming. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2010;210(14):1858-1869. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.06.021]
23. Chen CY, Hwang WS. Effect of annealing on the interfacial structure of aluminum-copper joints. Materials Transactions. 2007;48(7): 1938-1934. [Link] [DOI:10.2320/matertrans.MER2006371]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |