Volume 23, Issue 12 (December 2023)
Modares Mechanical Engineering 2023, 23(12): 685-695 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Dehghani P, Hosseinalipoor S M, Akbari H. Experimental Study of the Effect of Relative Humidity on Droplet Distribution and Transient and Average Condensation Heat Transfer on Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Surfaces. Modares Mechanical Engineering 2023; 23 (12) :685-695
URL: http://mme.modares.ac.ir/article-15-73406-en.html
URL: http://mme.modares.ac.ir/article-15-73406-en.html
1- University of Science and Technology
2- University of Science and Technology ,alipour@iust.ac.ir
2- University of Science and Technology ,
Abstract: (638 Views)
To investigate the effect of relative humidity percentage on heat transfer and distribution of droplets in the condensation phenomenon, a test device with the ability to provide and control different environmental conditions was made, and therefore, the hydrophilic (copper) and hydrophobic (Teflon coating on copper) surfaces were measured under controlled environmental conditions. In all the tests, the inlet air flow rate, inlet air temperature, air temperature reaching the test surface, water temperature, water surface height, and test surface temperature were kept constant at specific values using PID control. Each test's relative humidity values of 80, 88, and 96% have been determined and controlled. The results of the transient investigation of heat transfer show that it takes time for the condensation phenomenon to occur, and the higher the surface hydrophilicity and relative humidity, the shorter this time will be. Also, the average heat transfer for 60 minutes was calculated. It showed that the average heat transfer coefficient increases with increasing humidity. Under the same environmental conditions, the heat transfer coefficient on hydrophilic surfaces is higher than on hydrophobic ones. In the graphical analysis of the droplet size, it has been observed that the most oversized droplets on hydrophilic surfaces at relative humidities of 88 and 96% are in the hydraulic diameter range of 0.35 to 0.4, and on hydrophobic surfaces are at relative humidities of 80 and 88% in the hydraulic diameter range of 0.2 to 0.25 mm.
Keywords: hydrophilic, hydrophobic, PID control, relative humidity percentage, heat transfer coefficient, droplet distribution
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Heat & Mass Transfer
Received: 2024/01/14 | Accepted: 2024/03/6 | Published: 2023/12/1
Received: 2024/01/14 | Accepted: 2024/03/6 | Published: 2023/12/1
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |