مهندسی مکانیک مدرس

مهندسی مکانیک مدرس

بررسی تجربی تأثیر ضخامت ناحیه کنترل اکسیژن در چاپ پیوسته بدون لایه قطعات متخلخل پلیمری

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان
دانشگاه خواجه نصیر الدین طوسی
چکیده
در این پژوهش به ­منظور بررسی تأثیر ناحیه کنترل اکسیژن بر سرعت ساخت قطعات، از سامانه ساخت افزایشی به روش تولید پیوسته مایع واسط (CLIP) که توسط محققین همین مقاله طراحی و ساخته­ شده است، استفاده گردید. هدف اصلی مقاله افزایش سرعت ساخت قطعات متخلخل با 10 برابر سرعت بیشتر نسبت به روش پردازش دیجیتال نوری (DLP) است. اما برای دستیابی به این سرعت، بررسی میزان ارتفاع چاپ، میزان خرابی قطعه، و عمق پخت قطعه بسیار حائز اهمیت است. قطعاً ناحیه کنترل اکسیژن به­ عنوان یکی از مهم­ ترین پارامترهای تأثیرگذار بر موارد مذکور خواهد بود. بنابراین به ­منظور ایجاد و کنترل حجم ناحیه در بردارنده اکسیژن، از غشاء­های خاص نفوذ­پذیر گاز­ها در دو حالت پنجره ­ای شکل (جزیره ­ای و میکرو کانال)، به ­عنوان بستر ظرف رزین مایع استفاده گردید. سپس قطعاتی با ساختار متخلخل و پیچیده با استفاده از هرکدام از پنجره ­های فوق، با روش تولید پیوسته مایع واسط ساخته و مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. بر طبق یافته های این پژوهش استفاده از ظرف جزیره­ ای نسبت به ظرف میکرو کانال، علاوه بر بهبود کیفیت ظاهری قطعه، منجر به افزایش 107% مدت زمان قابلیت چاپ پیوسته پیش از شروع نیروی جدایش، کاهش 4/7 برابری بیشینه نیروی جدایش و افزایش30% در ارتفاع قطعه چاپ­ شده گردید.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Experimental research on the impact of oxygen control zone thickness on continuous layerless printing of porous polymer parts

نویسندگان English

Mohammad Salehi
Siavash Moayedi Manizani
Mohammad Shayesteh
Amir Manzour
Jamal Zamani
k n toosi university of technology
چکیده English

The additive manufacturing system using the continuous liquid interface production (CLIP) method, which was designed and constructed by the researchers of this article, was utilized in this research to examine the impacts of the oxygen control area's thickness on the speed of producing parts. The main goal of this research is to produce porous parts 10 times faster compared to the digital light processing (DLP) method. However, it's crucial to look at the printing height, the part failure rate, as well as the part curing depth in order to achieve this speed increase. One of the most crucial factors affecting the aforementioned circumstances is undoubtedly the oxygen control zone. Therefore, two window-shaped (island and microchannel) special gas-permeable membranes were utilized as the bed of the liquid resin container to generate this zone. Furthermore, employing each of the aforementioned windows, parts with a porous and complex structure were manufactured and evaluated. The usage of an island-like container increased the duration of continuous printing by 107% before the separation force begins, reduced maximum separation force by 4.7 times, and increased the height of the printed component by 30%, according to the study's findings. It also improved the part's visual quality.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Additive Manufacturing
Photopolymerization
Continuous liquid interface production
Oxygen control zone
Continuous printing
Layerless
[1]. He H, Xu J, Yu X, Pan Y. Effect of constrained surface texturing on separation force in projection stereolithography. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. 2018;140(9). [DOI:10.1115/1.4040322]
[1]. He H, Xu J, Yu X, Pan Y. Effect of constrained surface texturing on separation force in projection stereolithography. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. 2018;140(9). [DOI:10.1115/1.4040322]
[2]. Economidou SN, Pere CPP, Reid A, Uddin MJ, Windmill JF, Lamprou DA, et al. 3D printed microneedle patches using stereolithography (SLA) for intradermal insulin delivery. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2019;102:743-55. [DOI:10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.063]
[2]. Economidou SN, Pere CPP, Reid A, Uddin MJ, Windmill JF, Lamprou DA, et al. 3D printed microneedle patches using stereolithography (SLA) for intradermal insulin delivery. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2019;102:743-55. [DOI:10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.063]
[3]. Derakhshanfar S, Mbeleck R, Xu K, Zhang X, Zhong W, Xing M. 3D bioprinting for biomedical devices and tissue engineering: A review of recent trends and advances. Bioactive materials. 2018;3(2):144-56. [DOI:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.11.008]
[3]. Derakhshanfar S, Mbeleck R, Xu K, Zhang X, Zhong W, Xing M. 3D bioprinting for biomedical devices and tissue engineering: A review of recent trends and advances. Bioactive materials. 2018;3(2):144-56. [DOI:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.11.008]
[4]. Naftulin JS, Kimchi EY, Cash SS. Streamlined, inexpensive 3D printing of the brain and skull. PloS one. 2015;10(8):e0136198. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0136198]
[4]. Naftulin JS, Kimchi EY, Cash SS. Streamlined, inexpensive 3D printing of the brain and skull. PloS one. 2015;10(8):e0136198. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0136198]
[5]. Dhir V, Itoi T, Fockens P, Perez-Miranda M, Khashab MA, Seo DW, et al. Novel ex vivo model for hands-on teaching of and training in EUS-guided biliary drainage: creation of "Mumbai EUS" stereolithography/3D printing bile duct prototype (with videos). Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2015;81(2):440-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.011]
[5]. Dhir V, Itoi T, Fockens P, Perez-Miranda M, Khashab MA, Seo DW, et al. Novel ex vivo model for hands-on teaching of and training in EUS-guided biliary drainage: creation of "Mumbai EUS" stereolithography/3D printing bile duct prototype (with videos). Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2015;81(2):440-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.011]
[6]. Zheng X, Deotte J, Alonso MP, Farquar GR, Weisgraber TH, Gemberling S, et al. Design and optimization of a light-emitting diode projection micro-stereolithography three-dimensional manufacturing system. Review of Scientific Instruments. 2012;83(12):125001. [DOI:10.1063/1.4769050]
[6]. Zheng X, Deotte J, Alonso MP, Farquar GR, Weisgraber TH, Gemberling S, et al. Design and optimization of a light-emitting diode projection micro-stereolithography three-dimensional manufacturing system. Review of Scientific Instruments. 2012;83(12):125001. [DOI:10.1063/1.4769050]
[7]. Pagac M, Hajnys J, Ma Q-P, Jancar L, Jansa J, Stefek P, et al. A review of vat photopolymerization technology: Materials, applications, challenges, and future trends of 3d printing. Polymers. 2021;13(4):598. [DOI:10.3390/polym13040598]
[7]. Pagac M, Hajnys J, Ma Q-P, Jancar L, Jansa J, Stefek P, et al. A review of vat photopolymerization technology: Materials, applications, challenges, and future trends of 3d printing. Polymers. 2021;13(4):598. [DOI:10.3390/polym13040598]
[8]. Shusteff M, Panas RM, Henriksson J, Kelly BE, Browar AE, editors. Additive fabrication of 3d structures by holographic lithography. 2016 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium; 2016: University of Texas at Austin. [DOI:10.1126/sciadv.aao5496]
[8]. Shusteff M, Panas RM, Henriksson J, Kelly BE, Browar AE, editors. Additive fabrication of 3d structures by holographic lithography. 2016 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium; 2016: University of Texas at Austin. [DOI:10.1126/sciadv.aao5496]
[9]. Pan Y, He H, Xu J, Feinerman A. Study of separation force in constrained surface projection stereolithography. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2017;23(2):353-61. [DOI:10.1108/RPJ-12-2015-0188]
[9]. Pan Y, He H, Xu J, Feinerman A. Study of separation force in constrained surface projection stereolithography. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2017;23(2):353-61. [DOI:10.1108/RPJ-12-2015-0188]
[10]. Janusziewicz R, Tumbleston JR, Quintanilla AL, Mecham SJ, DeSimone JM. Layerless fabrication with continuous liquid interface production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016;113(42):11703-8. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.1605271113]
[10]. Janusziewicz R, Tumbleston JR, Quintanilla AL, Mecham SJ, DeSimone JM. Layerless fabrication with continuous liquid interface production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016;113(42):11703-8. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.1605271113]
[11]. Kuang X, Zhao Z, Chen K, Fang D, Kang G, Qi HJ. High‐speed 3D printing of high‐performance thermosetting polymers via two‐stage curing. Macromolecular rapid communications. 2018;39(7):1700809. [DOI:10.1002/marc.201700809]
[11]. Kuang X, Zhao Z, Chen K, Fang D, Kang G, Qi HJ. High‐speed 3D printing of high‐performance thermosetting polymers via two‐stage curing. Macromolecular rapid communications. 2018;39(7):1700809. [DOI:10.1002/marc.201700809]
[12]. Zhang B, Kowsari K, Serjouei A, Dunn ML, Ge Q. Reprocessable thermosets for sustainable three-dimensional printing. Nature communications. 2018;9(1):1-7. [DOI:10.1038/s41467-018-04292-8]
[12]. Zhang B, Kowsari K, Serjouei A, Dunn ML, Ge Q. Reprocessable thermosets for sustainable three-dimensional printing. Nature communications. 2018;9(1):1-7. [DOI:10.1038/s41467-018-04292-8]
[13]. Tumbleston JR, Shirvanyants D, Ermoshkin N, Janusziewicz R, Johnson AR, Kelly D, et al. Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects. Science. 2015;347(6228):1349-52. [DOI:10.1126/science.aaa2397]
[13]. Tumbleston JR, Shirvanyants D, Ermoshkin N, Janusziewicz R, Johnson AR, Kelly D, et al. Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects. Science. 2015;347(6228):1349-52. [DOI:10.1126/science.aaa2397]
[14]. Jiang Y, Wang Y, He H, Feinerman A, Pan Y. Constrained window design in projection stereolithography for continuous three-dimensional printing. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing. 2020;7(4):163-9. [DOI:10.1089/3dp.2019.0134]
[14]. Jiang Y, Wang Y, He H, Feinerman A, Pan Y. Constrained window design in projection stereolithography for continuous three-dimensional printing. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing. 2020;7(4):163-9. [DOI:10.1089/3dp.2019.0134]
[15]. Jiang Y, Wang Y, Lichade K, He H, Feinerman A, Pan Y. Textured window design for continuous projection stereolithography process. Manufacturing Letters. 2020;24:87-91. [DOI:10.1016/j.mfglet.2020.04.007]
[15]. Jiang Y, Wang Y, Lichade K, He H, Feinerman A, Pan Y. Textured window design for continuous projection stereolithography process. Manufacturing Letters. 2020;24:87-91. [DOI:10.1016/j.mfglet.2020.04.007]
[16]. Pan Y, Zhou C, Chen Y. A fast mask projection stereolithography process for fabricating digital models in minutes. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. 2012;134(5). [DOI:10.1115/1.4007465]
[16]. Pan Y, Zhou C, Chen Y. A fast mask projection stereolithography process for fabricating digital models in minutes. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. 2012;134(5). [DOI:10.1115/1.4007465]
[17]. Diffey BL. Sources and measurement of ultraviolet radiation. Methods. 2002;28(1):4-13. [DOI:10.1016/S1046-2023(02)00204-9]
[17]. Diffey BL. Sources and measurement of ultraviolet radiation. Methods. 2002;28(1):4-13. [DOI:10.1016/S1046-2023(02)00204-9]