Volume 20, Issue 5 (May 2020)                   Modares Mechanical Engineering 2020, 20(5): 1145-1156 | Back to browse issues page

‎ 20.1001.1.10275940.1399.20.5.19.8

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Fathi-Asgarabad E, Hashemi S. Experimental Measurement and Numerical Evaluation of Fracture Energy in Drop Weight Tear Test Specimen with Chevron Notch in API X65 Steel. Modares Mechanical Engineering 2020; 20 (5) :1145-1156
URL: http://mme.modares.ac.ir/article-15-34968-en.html
Experimental Measurement and Numerical Evaluation of Fracture Energy in Drop Weight Tear Test Specimen with Chevron Notch in API X65 Steel
E. Fathi-Asgarabad1 , S.H. Hashemi * 2
1- Mechanical Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran
2- Mechanical Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran , shhashemi@birjand.ac.ir
Abstract:   (2502 Views)

One of the most important purposes of the drop weight tear test (DWTT) is to achieve the value of fracture energy for better evaluation of tested steel properties. In the present research, experimental and numerical measurement of fracture energy in drop weight tear test specimen with chevron notch on API X65 steel has been carried out. The purpose of the determination of this energy is to estimate the strength of material due to fracture. The test specimen was cut from an actual spiral seam welded steel pipe of API X65 grade with an outside diameter of 1219mm and wall thickness of 14.3mm and then it has been machined to standard size. Then chevron notch with a length of 5.1 was placed in the middle of the specimen and the specimen was fractured under dynamic loading with an initial impact velocity of 6.3m/s. The maximum force of 229kN and 225kN were achieved for experimental and numerical data, respectively by drawing force-displacement and energy-displacement curves. The fracture energy of the test sample for experimental and numerical data was obtained as 7085J and 6800J, respectively by evaluation of the area under the force-displacement curve. Based on the results of experimental curves, about %59 of fracture energy was used for crack propagation and the remaining was used for crack initiation and plastic deformation of test sample near anvils and striker regions. In the end, drawing a linear curve for fracture energy of specimen based on the hammer velocity showed that the slope of this curve could be a good criterion for estimating the energy loss and fracture behavior of the test specimen.
 

Keywords: Drop Weight Tear Test, Gas Transportation Pipeline Steel, API X65 Steel, Fracture Energy
Full-Text [PDF 1238 kb]   (2172 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Metal Forming
Received: 2019/07/20 | Accepted: 2019/10/13 | Published: 2020/05/9
References
1. Dieter G. Mechanical Metallurgy. 1th edition. New York: McGrew-Hill; 1961. [Link] [DOI:10.5962/bhl.title.35895]
2. Zhao J, Hu W, Wang X, Kang J, Yuan G, Di H, et al. Effect of microstructure on the crack propagation behavior of microalloyed 560 MPa (X80) strip during ultra-fast cooling. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2016;666:214-224. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.msea.2016.04.073]
3. Majidi-Jirandehi A, Hashemi SH. Investigation of macroscopic fracture surface characteristics of spiral welded API X65 gas transportation pipeline steel. Modares Mechanical Engineering. 2017;17(11):219-228. [Persian]. [Link]
4. America Petroleum Institute [Report]. Specification for Line Pipe. 45th Edition. Washington: American Petroleum Institute (API); 2012. [Link]
5. Biagio MD, Demofonti G, Mannucci G, Iob F, Spinelli CM, Roovers P, et al. Development of a reliable model for evaluating the ductile fracture propagation resistance for high grade steel pipelines. Proceeding on 6th Pipeline Technology Conference, 2012 September 24-28, Calgary, Alberta. New York: ASME; 2013. [Link] [DOI:10.1115/IPC2012-90614]
6. Scheider I, Nonn A, Völling A, Mondry A, Kalwa C. A damage mechanics based evaluation of dynamic fracture resistance in gas pipelines. Procedia Materials Science. 2014;3:1956-1964. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.mspro.2014.06.315]
7. Babaei H, Darvizeh A, Alitavoli M, Mirzababaie Mostofi T. Experimental and analytical investigation into plastic deformation of circular plates subjected to hydrodynamic loading. Modares Mechanical Engineering. 2015;15(2):305-312. [Persian]. [Link]
8. Yu PS, Ru CQ. Analysis of energy absorptions in drop-weight tear tests of pipeline steel. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 2016;160:138-146. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.04.007]
9. Rudland DL, Wilkowski GM, Feng Z, Wang YY, Horsley D, Glover A. Experimental investigation of CTOA in linepipe steels. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 2003;70(3-4):567-577. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00138-8]
10. Nonn A, Kalwa C. Simulation of ductile crack propagation in high-strength pipeline steel using damage models. 9th International Pipeline Conference, 2012 September 24-28, Calgary, Alberta. New York: ASME; 2012. [Link] [DOI:10.1115/IPC2012-90653]
11. Simha CHM, Xu S, Tyson WR. Non-local phenomenological damage-mechanics-based modeling of the drop-weight tear test. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 2014;118:66-82. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.01.009]
12. Simha CHM, Xu S, Tyson WR. Computational modeling of the drop-weight tear test: A comparison of two failure modeling approaches. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 2015;148:304-323. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.06.085]
13. America Petroleum Institute [Report]. Recommended practice conducting drop-weight tear test on line pipe. 3th Edition. Washington: American Petroleum Institute (API); 1996. [Link]
14. Dassault Systèmes. ABAQUS/6.13 [Internet]. Providence: Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp; 2013 [Unknown cited]. Available from: http://dsk.ippt.pan.pl/docs/abaqus/v6.13/index.html [Link]
15. Tvergaard V, Needleman A. Analysis of cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar. Acta Metallurgica. 1984;32(1):157-169. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X]
16. Gurson AL. Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: Part 1, yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. Providence: Brown University; 1975. [Link] [DOI:10.2172/7351470]
17. Fathi Asgarabad E, Hashemi H, Ahmadi Beroghani U. Comparison of experimental and numerical fracture energy of thermo-mechanical steel in drop weight tear test. 5th Iranian Pipe & Pipeline Conference, 2013 December 10-12, Tehran, Iran. [Persian] [Link]
18. DOCUMENTS [Internet]. Impact Testing and Fracture Toughness. Unknown City: DOCUMENTS; 2014 [Unknown Cited]. Available from: https://documents.pub/document/impacttest-and-fracture-test.html [Link]
19. Hoffman JD. Numerical methods for engineers and scientists. 2td edition. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2001. [Link]
20. Nonn A, Kalwa C. Simulation of ductile crack propagation in high-strength pipeline steel using damage model, Proceedings of the 2012 9th International Pipeline Conference, 2012 September 24-28, Calgary, Alberta. New York: ASME; 2013. [Link] [DOI:10.1115/IPC2012-90653]
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.