Volume 19, Issue 10 (October 2019)
Modares Mechanical Engineering 2019, 19(10): 2351-2365 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ramezani S, Moini A, Riahi M. A Model to Determining the State of Degradation and Remaining Useful Life of Rotating Equipment, With a New Approach to Combination and Predicting Health Index. Modares Mechanical Engineering 2019; 19 (10) :2351-2365
URL: http://mme.modares.ac.ir/article-15-23660-en.html
URL: http://mme.modares.ac.ir/article-15-23660-en.html
1- School of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
2- School of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran ,moini@iust.ac.ir
2- School of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran ,
Abstract: (7187 Views)
Condition assessment is one of the most significant techniques of equipment health, repairs, maintenance, and management. Prognostics and Health Managemen (PHM) methodology cycle is a developed form of Condition Based Maintenance (CBM). Condition assessment is the most important step of this cycle. In this study, based on the presented model, the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) is estimated using equipment condition assessment. Using the simulation and forecasting of a new feature for the vibration of the equipment (Kurtosis-Entropy) by Autoregressive Markov Regime Switching (AMRS) method, equipment health condition is determined. Prior to forecasting the condition of the equipment, the equipment degradation state is determined by the fuzzy C-means clustering method. Based on the current state of equipment and pre-determined state of degradation, the remaining useful life of the equipment is estimated. In order to evaluate the model, the experimental data from the FEMTO-ST Institute, which is provided to estimate the remaining useful life of the bearing, was used and the results of the study are compared with the rival models. The innovation of this paper is the use of fuzzy C-means, a new approach to evidence theory for data fusion, and the use of the Markov switching model for prediction.
Keywords: Remaining Useful Life (RUL), Prognostics & Health Management (PHM), Autoregressive Markov Regime Switching (ARMRS), Health Index (HI), Theory of Evidence, Fuzzy clustering, Kurtosis-Entropy, Feature, Degradation
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Vibration
Received: 2018/07/30 | Accepted: 2019/02/13 | Published: 2019/10/22
Received: 2018/07/30 | Accepted: 2019/02/13 | Published: 2019/10/22
References
1. Lee J, Wu F, Zhao W, Ghaffari M, Liao L, Siegel D. Prognostics and health management design for rotary machinery systems-reviews, methodology and applications. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2014;42(1-2):314-334. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.06.004]
2. Ramos AL, Ferreira JV, Barceló J. Model-based systems engineering: An emerging approach for modern systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C Applications and Reviews. 2012;42(1):101-111. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/TSMCC.2011.2106495]
3. Kan MS, Tan ACC, Mathew J. A review on prognostic techniques for non-stationary and non-linear rotating systems. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2015;62-63:1-20. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.02.016]
4. An D, Kim NH, Choi JH. Practical options for selecting data-driven or physics-based prognostics algorithms with reviews. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2015;133:223-236. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2014.09.014]
5. Rai A, Upadhyay SH. A review on signal processing techniques utilized in the fault diagnosis of rolling element bearings. Tribology International. 2016;96:289-306. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.triboint.2015.12.037]
6. Mosallam A, Medjaher K, Zerhouni N. Data-driven prognostic method based on Bayesian approaches for direct remaining useful life prediction. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. 2016;27(5):1037-1048. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10845-014-0933-4]
7. Deng Y, Barros A, Grall A. Degradation modeling based on a time-dependent ornstein-uhlenbeck process and residual useful lifetime estimation. IEEE Transactions on Reliability. 2016;65(1):126-140. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/TR.2015.2462353]
8. Wang T. Bearing life prediction based on vibration signals: A case study and lessons learned. IEEE Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, 18-21 June 2012, Denver, CO, USA. Piscataway: IEEE; 2012. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/ICPHM.2012.6299547]
9. Sutrisno E, Oh H, Vasan ASS, Pecht M. Estimation of remaining useful life of ball bearings using data driven methodologies. IEEE Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, 18-21 June 2012, Denver, CO, USA. Piscataway: IEEE; 2012. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/ICPHM.2012.6299548]
10. Kimotho JK, Sondermann-Woelke C, Meyer T, Sextro W. Machinery prognostic method based on multi-class support vector machines and hybrid differential evolution-particle swarm optimization. Chemical Engineering Transactions. 2013;33:619-624. [Link]
11. Hong Sh, Zhou Z, Zio E, Wang W. An adaptive method for health trend prediction of rotating bearings. Digital Signal Processing. 2014;35:117-123. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.dsp.2014.08.006]
12. Hong Sh, Zhou Z, Zio E, Hong K. Condition assessment for the performance degradation of bearing based on a combinatorial feature extraction method. Digital Signal Processing. 2014;27:159-166. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.dsp.2013.12.010]
13. Lei Y, Li N, Guo L, Li N, Yan T, Lin J. Machinery health prognostics: A systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2018;104:799-834. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.016]
14. Soualhi A, Medjaher K, Zerhouni N. Bearing health monitoring based on Hilbert-Huang transform, support vector machine, and regression. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. 2015;64(1):52-62. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/TIM.2014.2330494]
15. Nie Y, Wan J. Estimation of remaining useful life of bearings using sparse representation method. Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM), 21-23 Oct 2015, Beijing, China. Piscataway: IEEE; 2015. [Link]
16. Zhang B, Zhang L, Xu J. Degradation feature selection for remaining useful life prediction of rolling element bearings. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 2016;32(2):547-554. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/qre.1771]
17. Guo L, Gao H, Huang H, He X, Li SC. Multifeatures fusion and nonlinear dimension reduction for intelligent bearing condition monitoring. Shock and Vibration. 2016;2016:4632562. [Link] [DOI:10.1155/2016/4632562]
18. Mosallam A, Medjaher K, Zerhouni N. Time series trending for condition assessment and prognostics. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. 2014;25(4):550-567. [Link] [DOI:10.1108/JMTM-04-2013-0037]
19. Li N, Lei Y, Lin J, Ding SX. An improved exponential model for predicting remaining useful life of rolling element bearings. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. 2015;62(12):7762-7773. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/TIE.2015.2455055]
20. Wang L, Zhang L, Wang XZ. Reliability estimation and remaining useful lifetime prediction for bearing based on proportional hazard model. Journal of Central South University. 2015;22(12):4625-4633. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11771-015-3013-9]
21. Ahmad W, Khan SA, Islam MM, Kim JM. A reliable technique for remaining useful life estimation of rolling element bearings using dynamic regression models. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2019;184:67-76. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2018.02.003]
22. Lei Y, Li N, Lin J. A new method based on stochastic process models for machine remaining useful life prediction. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. 2016;65(12):2671-2684. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/TIM.2016.2601004]
23. Niu G, Qian F, Choi BK. Bearing life prognosis based on monotonic feature selection and similarity modeling. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science. 2016;230(18):3183-3193. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0954406215608892]
24. Huang Z, Xu Z, Ke X, Wang W, Sun Y. Remaining useful life prediction for an adaptive skew-Wiener process model. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2017;87(Pt A):294-306. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.10.027]
25. Cheng Z. Residual useful life prediction for rolling element bearings based on multi-feature fusion regression. International Conference on Sensing, Diagnostics, Prognostics, and Control (SDPC), 16-18 Aug 2017, Shanghai, China. Piscataway: IEEE; 2017. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/SDPC.2017.54]
26. Trinh HC, Kwon YK. An empirical investigation on a multiple filters-based approach for remaining useful life prediction. Machines. 2018;6(3):35. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/machines6030035]
27. Ren L, Sun Y, Cui J, Zhang L. Bearing remaining useful life prediction based on deep autoencoder and deep neural networks. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 2018;48(Pt C):71-77. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.04.008]
28. Ren L, Sun Y, Wang H, Zhang L. Prediction of bearing remaining useful life with deep convolution neural network. IEEE Access. 2018;6:13041-13049. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2804930]
29. Wang J, Liang Y, Zheng Y, Gao RX, Zhang F. An integrated fault diagnosis and prognosis approach for predictive maintenance of wind turbine bearing with limited samples. Renewable Energy. 2019;145:642-650. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.103]
30. Boškoski P, Gašperin M, Petelin D. Bearing fault prognostics based on signal complexity and Gaussian process models. IEEE Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, 18-21 June 2012, Denver, CO, USA. Piscataway: IEEE; 2012. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/ICPHM.2012.6299545]
31. Guo L, Li N, Jia F, Lei Y, Lin J. A recurrent neural network based health indicator for remaining useful life prediction of bearings. Neurocomputing. 2017;240:98-109. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.neucom.2017.02.045]
32. Ali JB, Chebel-Morello B, Saidi L, Malinowski S, Fnaiech F. Accurate bearing remaining useful life prediction based on Weibull distribution and artificial neural network. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2015;56-57:150-172. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.10.014]
33. Zhao M, Tang B, Tan Q. Bearing remaining useful life estimation based on time-frequency representation and supervised dimensionality reduction. Measurement. 2016;86:41-55. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.measurement.2015.11.047]
34. Liao L, Jin W, Pavel R. Enhanced restricted Boltzmann machine with prognosability regularization for prognostics and health assessment. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. 2016;63(11):7076-7083. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/TIE.2016.2586442]
35. Wang ZQ, Hu CH, Fan HD. Real-time remaining useful life prediction for a nonlinear degrading system in service: Application to bearing data. IEEE ASME Transactions on Mechatronics. 2018;23(1):211-222. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/TMECH.2017.2666199]
36. Benkedjouh T, Medjaher K, Zerhouni N, Rechak S. Remaining useful life estimation based on nonlinear feature reduction and support vector regression. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2013;26(7):1751-1760. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.engappai.2013.02.006]
37. Lei Y, Li N, Gontarz S, Lin J, Radkowski S, Dybala J. A model-based method for remaining useful life prediction of machinery. IEEE Transactions on Reliability. 2016;65(3):1314-1326. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/TR.2016.2570568]
38. Kumar A, Chinnam RB, Tseng F. An HMM and polynomial regression based approach for remaining useful life and health state estimation of cutting tools. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2019;128:1008-1014. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2018.05.017]
39. Li Y, Li H, Wang B, Gu H. Rolling element bearing performance degradation assessment using variational mode decomposition and gath-geva clustering time series segmentation. International Journal of Rotating Machinery. 2017;2017:2598169. [Link] [DOI:10.1155/2017/2598169]
40. Bektas O, Jones JA, Sankararaman S, Roychoudhury I, Goebel K. A neural network filtering approach for similarity-based remaining useful life estimation. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2019;101(1-4):87-103. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s00170-018-2874-0]
41. Singleton RK, Strangas EG, Aviyente S. Extended Kalman filtering for remaining-useful-life estimation of bearings. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. 2015;62(3):1781-1790. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/TIE.2014.2336616]
42. Wang Y, Peng Y, Zi Y, Jin X, Tsui KL. A two-stage data-driven-based prognostic approach for bearing degradation problem. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. 2016;12(3):924-932. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/TII.2016.2535368]
43. Medjaher K, Zerhouni N, Baklouti J. Data-driven prognostics based on health indicator construction: Application to PRONOSTIA's data. European Control Conference (ECC), 17-19 July 2013, Zurich, Switzerland. Piscataway: IEEE; 2013. [Link] [DOI:10.23919/ECC.2013.6669223]
44. Loutas TH, Roulias D, Georgoulas G. Remaining useful life estimation in rolling bearings utilizing data-driven probabilistic e-support vectors regression. IEEE Transactions on Reliability. 2013;62(4):821-832. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/TR.2013.2285318]
45. Pan Y, Er MJ, Li X, Yu H, Gouriveau R. Machine health condition prediction via online dynamic fuzzy neural networks. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2014;35:105-113. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.engappai.2014.05.015]
46. Fumeo E, Oneto L, Anguita D. Condition based maintenance in railway transportation systems based on big data streaming analysis. Procedia Computer Science. 2015;53:437-446. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.321]
47. Liu Y, Hu X, Zhang W. Remaining useful life prediction based on health index similarity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2019;185:502-510. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2019.02.002]
48. Javed K, Gouriveau R, Zerhouni N. Novel failure prognostics approach with dynamic thresholds for machine degradation. 39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON), 10-13 Nov 2013, Vienna, Austria. Piscataway: IEEE; 2013. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/IECON.2013.6699844]
49. Tian Z. An artificial neural network method for remaining useful life prediction of equipment subject to condition monitoring. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. 2012;23(2):227-237. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10845-009-0356-9]
50. Javed K, Gouriveau R, Zemouri R, Zerhouni N. Features selection procedure for prognostics: An approach based on predictability. IFAC Proceedings Volumes. 2012;45(20):25-30. [Link] [DOI:10.3182/20120829-3-MX-2028.00165]
51. Pearson RK. Outliers in process modeling and identification. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology. 2002;10(1):55-63. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/87.974338]
52. Narendra Babu C, Eswara Reddy B. A moving-average filter based hybrid ARIMA-ANN model for forecasting time series data. Applied Soft Computing. 2014;23:27-38. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.asoc.2014.05.028]
53. Bezdek JC, Ehrlich R, Full W. FCM: The fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. Computers & Geosciences. 1984;10(2-3):191-203. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0098-3004(84)90020-7]
54. Aguayo L, Barreto GA. Novelty Detection in Time Series Using Self-Organizing Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Evaluation. Neural Processing Letters. 2018;47(2):717-744. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11063-017-9679-2]
55. Cheng C, Sa-Ngasoongsong A, Beyca O, Le T, Yang H, Kong ZJ, et al. Time series forecasting for nonlinear and non-stationary processes: A review and comparative study. IIE Transactions. 2015;47(10):1053-1071. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/0740817X.2014.999180]
56. Cempel C. Simple condition forecasting techniques in vibroacoustical diagnostics. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 1987;1(1):75-82. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0888-3270(87)90084-7]
57. Elghazel W, Bahi J, Guyeux C, Hakem M, Medjaher K, Zerhouni N. Dependability of wireless sensor networks for industrial prognostics and health management. Computers in Industry. 2015;68:1-5. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.compind.2014.10.004]
58. Ordóñez C, Lasheras FS, Roca-Pardiñas J, de Cos Juez FJ. A hybrid ARIMA-SVM model for the study of the remaining useful life of aircraft engines. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics. 2019;346:184-191. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cam.2018.07.008]
59. Pham HT, Tran VT, Yang BS. A hybrid of nonlinear autoregressive model with exogenous input and autoregressive moving average model for long-term machine state forecasting. Expert Systems with Applications. 2010;37(4):3310-3317. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.10.020]
60. Song Y, Liu D, Yang C, Peng Y. Data-driven hybrid remaining useful life estimation approach for spacecraft lithium-ion battery. Microelectronics Reliability. 2017;75:142-153. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.microrel.2017.06.045]
61. Zhou Y, Huang M. Lithium-ion batteries remaining useful life prediction based on a mixture of empirical mode decomposition and ARIMA model. Microelectronics Reliability. 2016;65:265-273. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.microrel.2016.07.151]
62. Hinchi AZ, Tkiouat M. Rolling element bearing remaining useful life estimation based on a convolutional long-short-term memory network. Procedia Computer Science. 2018;127:123-132. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2018.01.106]
63. Rai A, Upadhyay SH. The use of MD-CUMSUM and NARX neural network for anticipating the remaining useful life of bearings. Measurement. 2017;111:397-410. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.measurement.2017.07.030]
64. Ali JB, Fnaiech N, Saidi L, Chebel-Morello B, Fnaiech F. Application of empirical mode decomposition and artificial neural network for automatic bearing fault diagnosis based on vibration signals. Applied Acoustics. 2015;89:16-27. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.08.016]
65. Samanta B, Al-Balushi KR. Artificial neural network based fault diagnostics of rolling element bearings using time-domain features. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2003;17(2):317-328. [Link] [DOI:10.1006/mssp.2001.1462]
66. Zheng X, Fang H. An integrated unscented Kalman filter and relevance vector regression approach for lithium-ion battery remaining useful life and short-term capacity prediction. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2015;144:74-82. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2015.07.013]
67. Andre D, Nuhic A, Soczka-Guth T, Sauer DU. Comparative study of a structured neural network and an extended Kalman filter for state of health determination of lithium-ion batteries in hybrid electricvehicles. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2013;26(3):951-961. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.engappai.2012.09.013]
68. Cui L, Wang X, Xu Y, Jiang H, Zhou J. A novel switching unscented Kalman filter method for remaining useful life prediction of rolling bearing. Measurement. 2019;135:678-684. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.measurement.2018.12.028]
69. Li YS, Billington S, Zhang C, Kurfess T, Danyluk S, Liang S. Adaptive prognostics for rolling element bearing condition. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 1999;13(1):103-113. [Link] [DOI:10.1006/mssp.1998.0183]
70. Hamilton JD. A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society. 1989;57(2):357-384. [Link] [DOI:10.2307/1912559]
71. Perlin M. MS_Regress-the Matlab package for markov regime switching models. SSRN. 2015 Apr. [Link]
72. Shafer G. A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1976. [Link]
73. Sentz K. Combination of evidence in Dempster-Shafer theory. Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratories; 2002. [Link] [DOI:10.2172/800792]
74. Nectoux P, Gouriveau R, Medjaher K, Ramasso E, Chebel-Morello B, Zerhouni N, et al. PRONOSTIA: An experimental platform for bearings accelerated degradation tests. IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, PHM'12, Jun 2012, Denver, Colorado, United States. Villeurbanne: HAL; 2012. [Link]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |