Volume 23, Issue 3 (March 2023)
Modares Mechanical Engineering 2023, 23(3): 173-182 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
hasanvand A, Seif M S. Parametric study of underwater glider using hydrodynamic performance approach. Modares Mechanical Engineering 2023; 23 (3) :173-182
URL: http://mme.modares.ac.ir/article-15-62549-en.html
URL: http://mme.modares.ac.ir/article-15-62549-en.html
1- PhD candidate of sharif university of technology , ali.hasanvand@mech.sharif.edu
2- professor at sharif university of technology
2- professor at sharif university of technology
Abstract: (1076 Views)
Today, the use of underwater robots to explorer underwater conditions has significant grown. Underwater gliders (UG) are robot of the favorite of researchers for long-time operations due to their low energy consumption. Exact the identification of dimensional parameters is critical to evaluate the hydrodynamic performance of underwater gliders, which properly can rising the efficiency of robots. In this research, an attempt has been made to first extract a nonlinear dynamic model from UG. The dynamic model has been verified with the results of related other research. After checking the accuracy of the model, dimensional parametric investigation in robot hydrodynamic performance has been performed. Parameters such as buoyancy tank volume, Pitch angle and wing geometry have been target this research. In the study of each parameter, other parameters are considered constant so that the effect of target parameter can be measured. The results indicate that parameters have a significant impact on efficiency and hydrodynamic performance of the robot. Properly designed glider can be more flexible in the face of external disturbances, and causes higher speeds can be achieved when efficiency is not very important.
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Dynamics
Received: 2022/06/28 | Accepted: 2022/12/20 | Published: 2023/03/1
Received: 2022/06/28 | Accepted: 2022/12/20 | Published: 2023/03/1
References
1. [1] M. Tomphson, "The navys amazing ocean-powered underwater drone," 2013. [Online]. Available: http://swampland.time.com/2013/12 22/navy-underwater-drone/
2. [2] D. R. Blidberg, "The development of autonomous underwater vehicles (auv); a brief summary," in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), vol. 4, 2001.
3. [3] M. Rusling, "Gliders will aid naval research," 2009.
4. [4] Teledyne, "Teledyne webb research reaches second milestone with u.s. navy lbs-glider program," 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www.webbresearch.com/ newscenter/Reaches Second Milestone.aspx
5. [5] Alsema, "Seaexplorer, https://www.alseamar-alcen.com/ products/ underwaterglider / seaexplorer," 2017.
6. [6] D. C. Webb, P. J. Simonetti, and C. P. Jones, "Slocum: An underwater glider propelled by environmental energy," IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 447-452, 2001. [DOI:10.1109/48.972077]
7. [7] J. Sherman, R. E. Davis, W. Owens, and J. Valdes, "The autonomous underwater glider" spray"," IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 437-446, 2001. [DOI:10.1109/48.972076]
8. [8] C. Eriksen, T. Osse, R. Light, T. Wen, T. Lehman, P. Sabin, J. Ballard, and A. Chiodi, "Seaglider: a long-range autonomous underwater vehicle for oceanographic research," IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 424-436, Oct 2001. [DOI:10.1109/48.972073]
9. [9] B. Ullah, M. Ovinis, M. B. Baharom, M. Javaid, and S. Izhar, "Underwater gliders control strategies: A review," in Control Conference (ASCC), 2015 10th Asian. IEEE, 2015, pp. 1-6. [DOI:10.1109/ASCC.2015.7244859]
10. [10] Jenkins, S.A., Humphreys, D.E., Sherman, J., Osse, J., Jones, C., Leonard, N., Graver, J., Bachmayer, R., Clem, T., Carroll, P. and Davis, P., 2003. Underwater glider system study.
11. [11] Graver, J.G., Bachmayer, R., Leonard, N.E. and Fratantoni, D.M., 2003, August. Underwater glider model parameter identification. In Proc. 13th Int. Symp. on Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology (UUST) (Vol. 1, pp. 12-13).
12. [12] Zhang, F., Thon, J., Thon, C. and Tan, X., 2013. Miniature underwater glider: Design and experimental results. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 19(1), pp.394-399. [DOI:10.1109/TMECH.2013.2279033]
13. [13] Yang, C., Peng, S. and Fan, S., 2014. Performance and stability analysis for ZJU glider. Marine Technology Society Journal: The International, Interdisciplinary Society Devoted to Ocean and Marine Engineering, Science and PolicyM, 48(3), pp.88-103. [DOI:10.4031/MTSJ.48.3.6]
14. [14] Jing, G., Lei, L. and Gang, Y., 2022. Dynamic modeling and experimental analysis of an underwater glider in the ocean. Applied Mathematical Modelling. [DOI:10.1016/j.apm.2022.03.034]
15. [15] Lyu, D., Song, B., Pan, G., Yuan, Z. and Li, J., 2019. Winglet effect on hydrodynamic performance and trajectory of a blended-wing-body underwater glider. Ocean Engineering, 188, p.106303. [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106303]
16. [16] Magano, K., Meyers, L. and Msomi, V., 2021. Developments in the investigation of underwater glider wing profile. Materials Today: Proceedings. [DOI:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.648]
17. [17] Yu, P., Wang, T., Zhou, H. and Shen, C., 2018. Dynamic modeling and three-dimensional motion simulation of a disk type underwater glider. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 10(3), pp.318-328. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2017.08.002]
18. [18] Nakamura, M., Hyodo, T. and Koterayama, W., 2007, July. "LUNA" testbed vehicle for virtual mooring. In The Seventeenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. OnePetro.
19. [19] Wu, H., Niu, W., Wang, S. and Yan, S., 2021. An analysis method and a compensation strategy of motion accuracy for underwater glider considering uncertain current. Ocean Engineering, 226, p.108877. [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108877]
20. [20] Lee, S., Choi, H.S., Kim, J.Y. and Paik, K.J., 2020. A numerical study on hydrodynamic maneuvering derivatives for heave-pitch coupling motion of a ray-type underwater glider. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 12, pp.892-901. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2020.10.002]
21. [21] Singh, Y., Bhattacharyya, S.K. and Idichandy, V.G., 2017. CFD approach to modelling, hydrodynamic analysis and motion characteristics of a laboratory underwater glider with experimental results. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science, 2(2), pp.90-119. [DOI:10.1016/j.joes.2017.03.003]
22. [22] Fossen, T.I., 2011. Handbook of marine craft hydrodynamics and motion control. John Wiley & Sons. [DOI:10.1002/9781119994138]
23. [23] J. Yuh. Modeling and control of underwater robot vehicles. In IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, volume 20, pages 1475-1483, 1990. [DOI:10.1109/21.61218]
24. [24] Molland, A.F. and Turnock, S.R., 2011. Marine rudders and control surfaces: principles, data, design and applications. Elsevier.
25. [25] Seif, M.S. and Hasanvand, A., 2021. Investigating the geometry and control surface of AUV robots on hydrodynamics performance. Journal of Marine Engineering, 17(33), pp.53-64.
26. [26] Ortiz, X., Rival, D. and Wood, D., 2015. Forces and moments on flat plates of small aspect ratio with application to PV wind loads and small wind turbine blades. Energies, 8(4), pp.2438-2453. [DOI:10.3390/en8042438]
27. [27] Hasanvand, A. and Hajivand, A., 2019. Investigating the effect of rudder profile on 6DOF ship turning performance. Applied Ocean Research, 92, p.101918. [DOI:10.1016/j.apor.2019.101918]
28. [28] Hasanvand, A., Hajivand, A. and Ali, N.A., 2021. Investigating the effect of rudder profile on 6DOF ship course-changing performance. Applied Ocean Research, 117, p.102944. [DOI:10.1016/j.apor.2021.102944]
29. [29] Prestero, T.T.J., 2001. Verification of a six-degree of freedom simulation model for the REMUS autonomous underwater vehicle (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts institute of technology). [DOI:10.1575/1912/3040]
30. [30] Navabi M, Mirzaei H R. Dynamic Modeling and Nonlinear Adaptive Control of Mesicopter Flight. Modares Mechanical Engineering 2015; 15 (5) :1-12.
31. [31] mazare M, ghanbari P, kazemi M, Najafi M R. Dynamic Modeling and Optimal Adaptive Robust Control of an Omni Directional Mobile Robot Using Harmony Search Algorithm. Modares Mechanical Engineering 2017; 17 (8) :191-200.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |