مهندسی مکانیک مدرس

مهندسی مکانیک مدرس

بررسی ناپایداری احتراق در مشعل جریان همسو سوخت و هوا

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
گروه مهندسی مکانیک، دانشگاه هرمزگان، بندرعباس، ایران
چکیده
این مطالعه، مدل جبهه واکنش همدوس چندمقیاسی (MSRC) را معرفی می‌کند، یک چارچوب پیش‌بینی‌کننده برای تحلیل ناپایداری‌های هیدرودینامیکی و ترموآکوستیک در مشعل‌های سوخت-هوای جریان همسو بطوریکه مدل MSRC، دینامیک غیرخطی گینزبورگ-لاندائو را با کوپلینگ آکوستیک و شبیه‌سازی گردابه‌های بزرگ (LES) ادغام می‌کند. اعتبارسنجی مدل با داده‌های تجربی مشعل دانشگاه آلبرتا (شامل ساختار شعله، دما، غلظت گونه‌ها، نوسانات سرعت و گردابه، و انتشار آلاینده‌ها) انجام شده است و دقت آن را تأیید می‌کند. چارچوب MSRC گذارهای پیچیده از احتراق پایدار به نوسانات چرخه‌ای محدود (LCO) و رفتار آشوبناک را ثبت می‌کند. تحلیل نوسانات سرعت و گردابه، ساختارهای همدوس با فرکانس پایین (<200 Hz) را در نازل نشان می‌دهد که با مدهای آکوستیک سیستم همبستگی دارند و ناپایداری لایه برشی را تأیید می‌کنند. مدل همچنین ناپایداری‌های لایه برشی فرکانس بالا (در اعداد رینولدز بالا) را از کوپلینگ ترموآکوستیک متمایز می‌کند. در نهایت، نشان داده می‌شود که بهینه‌سازی جریان هوای همسو می‌تواند احتراق را تثبیت کرده و انتشار آلاینده‌ها را کاهش دهد. این نتایج، ابزاری ارزشمند برای طراحی سیستم‌های احتراق پایدار و کم‌انتشار فراهم می‌کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Investigation of combustion instability in a co-flow burner with fuel and air

نویسندگان English

Hamed Helmi
Younes Bakhshan
Pouyan Adibi
Mechanical Engineering Department, Hormozgan University, Badar abbas, Iran
چکیده English

This paper introduces the multiscale coherent reaction front (MSRC) model, a predictive framework for the analysis of hydrodynamic and thermoacoustic instabilities in co-flow fuel-air burners. The MSRC model integrates nonlinear Ginzburg-Landau dynamics with acoustic coupling and large eddy simulation (LES). Model validation with experimental burner data from the University of Alberta (including flame structure, temperature, species concentration, velocity and vorticity fluctuations, and pollutant emissions) has been performed and confirms its accuracy. The MSRC framework captures complex transitions from stable combustion to limited cyclic oscillations (LCO) and chaotic behavior. Analysis of velocity and vorticity fluctuations reveals low-frequency (<200 Hz) coherent structures in the nozzle that correlate with the acoustic modes of the system and confirm shear layer instability. The model also distinguishes high-frequency shear layer instabilities (at high Reynolds numbers) from thermoacoustic coupling. Finally, it is shown that optimization of the aligned airflow can stabilize combustion and reduce pollutant emissions. These results provide a valuable tool for the design of stable and low-emission combustion systems.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Combustion instability
co-current burner
steam dilution flow
large eddies
Kelvin-Helmholtz instability
[1] F. E. Culick and P. Kuentzmann, “Unsteady motions in combustion chambers for propulsion systems,” No. AC323AVT039TP103, 2006.
[2] T. Lieuwen, “Combustion Instabilities in Gas Turbine Engines: Operational Experience,” Fundamental Mechanisms, and Modeling. Reston, VA, USA: AIAA, 2005. doi: 10.2514/4.866807
[3] S. Candel, D. Durox, and T. Schuller, “Perturbed Flame Dynamics and Thermo‑Acoustic Instabilities,” in Combustion Phenomena, 2009, p. 80.
[4] J. O’Connor, S. Hemchandra, and T. Lieuwen, “Combustion instabilities in lean premixed systems,” in Lean Combustion, Academic Press, 2016, pp. 231–259. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-804557-2.00007-9
[5] C. Clanet and G. Searby, “First experimental study of the Darrieus-Landau instability,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 80, no. 17, p. 3867, 1998. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3867
[6] S. I. Blinnikov and P. V. Sasorov, “Landau-Darrieus instability and the fractal dimension of flame fronts,” Physical Review E, vol. 53, no. 5, p. 4827, 1996. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.53.4827
[7] G. I. Sivashinsky, “Diffusional-thermal theory of cellular flames,” Combustion Science and Technology, vol. 15, no. 3-4, pp. 137–145, 1977. doi: 10.1080/00102207708946779
[8] N. Peters, “Turbulent Combustion.” Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000. doi: 10.1017/S0022112000002676
[9] S. B. Pope, “Turbulent premixed flames,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 237‑270, 1987.
[10] F. A. Williams, “Combustion Theory,” 2nd ed. Menlo Park, CA, USA: Addison-Wesley, 1985. doi: 10.1201/9780429494055
[11] S. B. Pope, “Turbulent Flows.” Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[12] Jones, WPa, and J. H. Whitelaw. "Calculation methods for reacting turbulent flows: a review." Combustion and flame 48 (1982): 1-26. doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(82)90112-2
[13] T. Poinsot and D. Veynante, “Theoretical and Numerical Combustion,” 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: RT Edwards Inc., 2005.
[14] B. E. Launder and D. B. Spalding, “The numerical computation of turbulent flows,” in Numerical prediction of flow, heat transfer, turbulence and combustion, Pergamon, 1983, pp. 96–116. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-030937-8.50016-7
[15] B. H. Hjertager, “Simulation of transient compressible turbulent reactive flows,” Combustion Science and Technology, vol. 27, no. 5–6, pp. 159–170, 1982. doi: 10.1080/00102208208946985
[16] E. R. Hawkes and R. S. Cant, “A flame surface density approach to large‑eddy simulation of premixed turbulent combustion,” Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 51–58, 2000. doi: 10.1016/S0082-0784(00)80194-0
[17] W. P. Jones, A. J. Marquis, and K. Vogiatzaki, “Large‑eddy simulation of spray combustion in a gas turbine combustor,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 161, no. 1, pp. 222–239, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.07.016
[18] S. B. Pope, “The probability approach to the modelling of turbulent reacting flows,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 27, pp. 299–312, 1976. doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(76)90035-3
[19] R. Santhosh and R. Yadav, “Flame Stabilization Modes in Non‑Premixed NH3/H₂/N₂ swirling flames—A numerical study,” Combustion Science and Technology, vol. 198, no. 9, pp. 2543–2565, 2026. doi: 10.1080/00102202.2025.2509855
[20] L. Berger, A. Attili, and H. Pitsch, “Intrinsic instabilities in premixed hydrogen flames: Parametric variation of pressure, equivalence ratio, and temperature. Part 1—Dispersion relations in the linear regime,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 240, 111935, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111935
[21] A. Palies, “Flow and Flame Mechanisms for Swirl-Stabilized Combustors,” Aerospace, vol. 12, no. 5, p. 430, 2025. doi: 10.3390/aerospace12050430
[22] R. C. Aldredge and B. Zuo, “Flame acceleration associated with the Darrieus-Landau instability,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 2091–2101, 2001. doi: 10.1016/S0010-2180(01)00312-1
[23] I. Verma et al., “Numerical Investigation of Lean Hydrogen-Air Flame Stabilization Regimes Using Large-Eddy Simulations,” in Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, vol. 87936, p. V002T03A041, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2024. doi: 10.1115/GT2024-129230
[24] C. J. Rising et al., “Numerical investigation of turbulent flame-vortex interaction in premixed cavity stabilized flames,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 129, p. 107805, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2022.107805
[25] R. Franco, C. Celis, and L. F. F. da Silva, “Numerical simulation of bluff body turbulent flows using hybrid RANS/LES turbulence models,” Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, vol. 45, no. 4, p. 217, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s40430-023-04148-3
[26] A. Ahsan, M. Aydin, M. S. Mansour, and A. A. Al-Qaydi, “Quantifying the carbon conversion efficiency and emission indices of a lab-scale natural gas flare with internal coflows of air or steam,” Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, vol. 103, pp. 133–142, May 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2019.01.013
[27] F. Garnier, T. Jaravel, A. Boudin, D. Laera, and T. Poinsot, “Influence of turbulent inflow conditions on the large-eddy simulation of a non-premixed hydrogen-air jet flame,” in Low-Carbon Combustion Meeting, 2024.
[28] K. Zheng, J. Jiang, Z. Xing, Y. Hao, M. Yu, X. Yang, and Y. Tao, “Application of large eddy simulation in methane‑air explosion prediction using thickening flame approach,”
Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 159, pp. 662–673, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2022.01.044
[29] Y. Xia, A. S. Morgans, W. P. Jones, J. Rogerson, G. Bulat, and X. Han, “Predicting thermoacoustic instability in an industrial gas turbine combustor: Combining a low order network model with flame LES,” in Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, vol. 50848, p. V04AT04A017. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2017. doi: 10.1115/GT2017-63247
[30] F.-c. Zhao, B.-g. Sun, S. Yuan, L.-z. Bao, H. Wei, and Q.-h. Luo, “Experimental and modeling investigations to improve the performance of the near-zero NOx emissions direct-injection hydrogen engine by injection optimization,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 49, pp. 713–724, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.09.039
[31] M. Jamshidiha, M. M. Kamal, L. Giuntini, A. Coussement, M. Lubrano Lavadera, and A. Parente, “Comparative effects of N₂ and CO₂ fuel dilution on NOx suppression in non‑premixed hydrogen combustion,” Applied Thermal Engineering, 2025, 129508. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.129508
[32] K. Duraisamy, “Perspectives on machine learning-augmented Reynolds-averaged and large eddy simulation models of turbulence,” Physical Review Fluids, vol. 6, no. 5, p. 050504, 2021. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.050504
[33] M. Rahmati, “Applications and Analysis Methods of Turbulent Combustion: A Review,” International Journal of Fluid Mechanics Research, vol. 51, no. 2, 2024. doi: 10.1615/InterJFluidMechRes.2024047803
[34] M. N. Nejaamtheen and J.-Y. Choi, “A Comprehensive Review of Flamelet Methods: Future Directions and Emerging Challenges,” Energies, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 45, 2024. doi: 10.3390/en18010045
[35] M. E. Shejan, S. M. Y. Bhuiyan, M. P. Schoen, and R. Mahamud, “Assessment of machine learning techniques for simulating reacting flow: From plasma‑assisted ignition to turbulent flame propagation,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 19, p. 4887, 2024. doi: 10.3390/en17194887
[36] J. Wu, X. Wang, G. Zhang, J. Liu, X. Li, Y. Zhang, H. Zhang, J. Lyu, B. Wang, and Y. Wu, “Physics‑informed machine learning for combustion: A review,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.03347, 2025.
doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.03347
[37] S. Iavarone, H. Yang, Z. Li, Z. X. Chen, and N. Swaminathan, “On the use of machine learning for subgrid scale filtered density function modelling in large eddy simulations of combustion systems,” in Machine Learning and Its Application to Reacting Flows: ML and Combustion, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 209–243. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-16248-0_8
[38] V. Xing, “Deep learning for subgrid‑scale modeling in large eddy simulations of turbulent premixed combustion,” Ph.D. dissertation, Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse‑INPT, 2022.
[39] M. Ihme, W. T. Chung, and A. A. Mishra, “Combustion machine learning: Principles, progress and prospects,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., vol. 91, 2022, Art. no. 101010, doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2022.101010
[40] H. Pitsch, “Large-eddy simulation of turbulent combustion,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 453–482, 2006. doi: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092133
[41] N. Padmanabhan, “Recent advancements in large eddy simulations of compressible real gas flows,” in Computational Fluid Dynamics‑Analysis, Simulations, and Applications, IntechOpen, 2024. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.1005573
[42] T. Nilsson, H. Carlsson, R. Yu, and X.-S. Bai, “Structures of turbulent premixed flames in the high Karlovitz number regime–DNS analysis,” Fuel, vol. 216, 2018, pp. 627–638, doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.12.046
[43] H. Ahsan, “Experimental study on the carbon conversion efficiency and emission indices of a lab‑scale air‑assisted flare,” 2019. doi: 10.7939/r3-e04y-tz30