Modares Mechanical Engineering

Modares Mechanical Engineering

Comparison of analytical and experimental design -based optimization methods to determine the optimum part build orientation in rapid prototyping processes

Author
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Rapid prototyping (Additive manufacturing or 3D printing) is defined as the process that can build 3D physical part from the designed model in CAD software by joining materials directly. In the RP process, the orientation pattern of the part is one of the most important factors that significantly affect the product properties such as the build time, the surface roughness, the mechanical strength, and the amount of support material. The build time and the surface roughness are the more imperative criteria than others that can be considered to find the optimum orientation of parts. In this paper, two algorithms based on analytical and empirical optimization methods are presented to determine optimum part build orientation in order to minimize build time and surface roughness. To implement this method, the user's part is received in standard triangle language (STL) format. Then, using the geometric characteristics and type of part orientation, the build time and the average of surface roughness is calculated. In order to determine the optimum part build orientation, two analytical (NSGA-II method) and experimental (new and developed Taguchi method) optimization methods have been used. After introducing the steps of these two methods, in order to determine optimum part build orientation, the steps of these two proposed algorithms are implemented on a part as a case study and obtained results are compared and discussed.
Keywords

[1] P. M. Pandey, P. V. Reddy, S. G. Dhande, Slicing procedures in layered manufacturing: A review, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 274- 288, 2003.
[2] E. Sachs, M. Cima, P. Williams, D. Brancazio, J. Cornie, 3-dimensional printing -rapid tooling and prototypes directly from a cad model, Transactions of the North American Manufacturing Research Institution of Sme 1991, Vol. 114, No. 4, pp. 481-489, 1992.
[3] J. P. Kruth, M. C. Leu, T. Nakagawa, Progress in additive manufacturing and rapid prototyping, CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 525-540, 1998.
[4] H. Bikas, P. Stavropoulos, G. Chryssolouris, Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: A critical review, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 83, No. 1, pp. 389- 405, 2016.
[5] P. Das, R. Chandran, R. Samant, S. Anand, Optimum part build orientation in additive manufacturing for minimizing part errors and support structures, Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 343-354, 2015.
[6] G. Moroni, W. Syam, S. Petrò, Functionality-based part orientation for additive manufacturing, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 217-222, 2015.
[7] P. Alexander, S. Allen, D. Dutta, Part orientation and build cost determination in layered manufacturing, Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 343-356, 1998.
[8] P. Hanzl, M. Zetek, T. Bakša, T. Kroupa, The influence of processing parameters on the mechanical properties of SLM Parts, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 100, pp. 1405-1413, 2015.
[9] W. Cheng, J. Y. H. Fuh, A. Y. C. Nee, Y. S. Wong, H. T. Loh, T. Miyazawa, Multi-objective optimization of part-building orientation in stereolithography, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 12-23, 1995.
[10] A. M. Phatak, S. S. Pande, Optimum part orientation in rapid prototyping using genetic algorithm, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 395-402, 2012.
[11] R. Jamieson, H. Hacker, Direct slicing of CAD models for rapid prototyping, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 4-12, 1995.
[12] A. Dolenc, I. Mäkelä, Rapid prototyping from a computer scientist’s point of view, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 18-25, 1995.
[13] A. H. Golmohammadi, S. Khodaygan, Build time estimation in additive manufacturing processes based on part orientations, Modares Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 7, pp. 9-16, 2017. (in Persian فارسی(
[14] D. Ahn, H. Kim, S. Lee, Surface roughness prediction using measured data and interpolation in layered manufacturing, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 209, No. 2, pp. 664-671, 2009.
[15] J. Angeles, The role of the rotation matrix in the teaching of planar kinematics, Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 89, No. 1, pp. 28-37, 2015.
[16] S. Leary, A. Bhaskar, A. Keane, Optimal orthogonal-array-based latin hypercubes, Journal of Applied Statistics, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 585-598, 2003.
[17] J. Payandehpeyman, Gh. Majzoobi, R. Bagheri, Deriving parameters of pressure-dependent yield surface for polymeric composites using krigingbased optimization method, Modares Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 280-290, 2016. (in Persian فارسی(
[18] J. Sacks, W. J. Welch, T. J. Mitchell, H. P. Wynn, Design and analysis of computer experiments, Statistical Science, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 409-423, 1989.
[19] K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, T. Meyarivan, A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 182-197, 2002.
[20] A. N. Oskouei, H. Khodarahmi, M. Sohrabi, Experimental and numerical study of conical thin shells collapse under dynamic axial loadings, Modares Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 7, pp. 392-402, 2015. (in Persian فارسی(
[21] M. H. Shojaeefard, A. Khalkhali, M. Tahani, B. Salimian rizi, Multi objective optimization of the centrifugal oil pump impeller, Modares Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 13, pp. 139-149, 2014. (in Persian فارسی(
[22] M. N. O. Stru, E. Z. Uporabo, T. M. N. G. Podlagi, Multi-objective optimization of the cutting forces in turning operations using the grey-based Taguchi method, Materiali in Tehnologije, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 105-110, 2011.
[23] D. Moradkhani, F. Taghavi, Introduction to Design of Experiments Via Taguchi Methods, pp. 45-48, Zanjan: Zanjan University, 2008. (in (فارسی Persian