Modares Mechanical Engineering

Modares Mechanical Engineering

Comparison of Dynamic Stall Models Using Numerical and Semi-Empirical Approaches for a Wind-Turbine Airfoil

Authors
1 Aerospace Engineering, Faculty of mechanical engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 Modares university
3 Tarbiat Modares
Abstract
In this paper, the Semi-Empirical and numerical methods that can be used to investigate the effects of dynamic stall are compared with each other, and the capabilities of the methods are studied. The experimental measurements have been used in order to compare the methods. The Semi-Empirical Leishman-Beddoes (L-B), Snel and ONERA methods have been used, and the finite volume method was being used for numerical simulations. The lift coefficient was being calculated by all the methods at various conditions, and the drag coefficient had been computed by the numerical and Leishman-Beddoes methods. The parameters that have been used in order to compare the methods, are the maximum lift coefficient value, the angle of attack of the largest lift coefficient, the error at upstroke phase and the error at down stroke phase. The results show among the semi-empirical models; the L-B method has the highest precision to predict the lift coefficient, and although the numerical method can investigate the flow with more details, but the error percentage at the down stroke phase is higher than expectations. The results from the drag coefficient modeling show that the numerical method can predict this coefficient better than the L-B method. The results also can help other researchers to select the best dynamic stall model in order to investigate the wind-turbine aerodynamics.
Keywords

[1] C. P. Butterfield, Aerodynamic pressure and flow-visualization measurement from a rotating wind turbine blade, Eighth ASME Wind Energy Symposium, Houston, Texas, 1989.
[2] P. Liu, G. Yu, X. Zhu, Z. Du, Unsteady aerodynamic prediction for dynamic stall of wind turbine airfoils with the reduced order modeling, Renewable Energy, Vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 402-409, 2014.
[3] J. G. Leishman, T. Beddoes, A Semi‐Empirical model for dynamic stall, Journal of the American Helicopter Society, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 3-17, 1989
[4] C. Tran, D. Petot, Semi-empirical model for the dynamic stall of airfoils in view of the application to the calculation of responses of a helicopter blade in forward flight, 6 th European Rotorcraft and Powered Light Aircraft Forum, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1980.
[5] H. Snel, Heuristic modelling of dynamic stall characteristics, European Wind Energy Conference, Dublin, Ireland, 1997.
[6] S. Gupta, J. G. Leishman, Dynamic stall modelling of the S809 aerofoil and comparison with experiments, Wind Energy, Vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 521-547, 2006.
[7] R. Pereira, G. Schepers, M. D. Pavel, Validation of the Beddoes–Leishman dynamic stall model for horizontal axis wind turbines using MEXICO data, Wind Energy, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 207-219, 2013.
[8] E. M. Gaertner, M. A. Lackner, Modeling dynamic stall for a free vortex wake model, Wind Engineering, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 675-691, 2015.
[9] A. Ebrahimi, M. Sekandari, Aero elastic response of horizontal-axis wind turbine in sudden wind gusts based on Unsteady Blade Element Momentum method, Modares Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 8, pp. 177-184, 2016. (in Persian فارسی(
[10] K. Gharali, D. A. Johnson, Dynamic stall simulation of a pitching airfoil under unsteady freestream velocity, Journal of Fluids and Structures, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 228-244, 2013.
[11] H. Hafizi-Rad, M. Behbahani-Nejad, S. S. Bahrainian, P. Tabibi, 3D analysis of the boundary layer on wind turbine blades, Modares Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 119-128, 2014. (In Persian فارسی(
[12] K. Gharali, D. A. Johnson, Numerical modeling of an S809 airfoil under dynamic stall, erosion and high reduced frequencies, Applied Energy, Vol. 93, No. 1, pp. 45-52, 2012.
[13] R. R. Ramsay, M. J. Hoffmann, , G. M. Gregorek, Effects of Grit Roughness and Pitch Oscillations on the S825 Airfoil, United States: National Renewable Energy Lab, 1998.
[14] T. Theodorsen, W. Mutchler, General Theory of aerodynamic Instability and the Mechanism of Flutter, pp. 1-26, United States: NACA, 1935.
[15] B. Thwaites, R. Street, Incompressible aerodynamics, Physics Today, Vol. 13, No. 12, pp. 60, 1960.
[16] F. R. Menter, Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications, AIAA Journal, Vol. 32, No. 8, pp. 1598-1605, 1994.
[17] X. Cai, R. Gu, P. Pan, J. Zhu, Unsteady aerodynamics simulation of a fullscale horizontal axis wind turbine using CFD methodology, Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 112, No. 1, pp. 146-156, 2016.